Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revised Ranger Play Report... (level 3 to 4, beastmaster)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cyber-Dave" data-source="post: 6922289" data-attributes="member: 82132"><p>Why would you assume that my DM would not be bothered by giving out numbers for type as well? Not to mention, my DM gave examples. Those should be considered as exemplary, not complete. You seem to really want my DM to be ok with the power after Horwath's rather good point. I don't want to speak for my DM. He can do that on his own. Based on what he has said to me so far, however, I do not think he would be ok with the power if it didn't name type and tag. I think his issues are far more broad than, "it informs the player of type and tag," or he would have just told me, "I don't plan to tell you what tag the humanoids in the area are." Quite frankly, I think he would be equally annoyed to have to regularly tell me, "there are 28 humanoids 5 miles to the east, 13 4 miles to the west, over 100 back south in the direction of the city you just came from, and 1 dragon 4 miles north of you." </p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span><span style="color: #000000"> </span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">The fact that you find it easy is irrelevant. Point is, what he would have to do to adjudicate the power as written makes the game less fun for him, no matter what you think about that. In fact, despite pukunui's examples, he has said that holds true for him as well. That is a valuable observation in and of itself. If enough players share that subjective opinion of the power as written, it should be modified before appearing in official print. If it is a subjective opinion only held by a vast minority, that minority can houserule as required to fix the problem. That is all. This is just anecdotal feedback from my table, which makes me question why you are trying so hard to argue that this anecdotal feedback should not be considered valid. I can't figure out what YOUR goal is in this thread. Are you saying that the subjective feedback from my table is "wrong," and we do not have the "right" to feel the way we do? If not, what are you trying to argue with? Can you please explain your motivation and what you are hoping to achieve? Perhaps that would help resolve this discussion... </span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p></p><p>I agree. I believe that this is probably why, up to now, my DM has allowed me to learn what I want to learn without forcing me to make any rolls. The fact remains, however, that the power as written made his hairs stand on end and make him leery of its use. It sounds like a lot of other people have a similar problem, though I can't be certain. I would rather it didn't do that to my DM, let alone a lot of other people.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cyber-Dave, post: 6922289, member: 82132"] Why would you assume that my DM would not be bothered by giving out numbers for type as well? Not to mention, my DM gave examples. Those should be considered as exemplary, not complete. You seem to really want my DM to be ok with the power after Horwath's rather good point. I don't want to speak for my DM. He can do that on his own. Based on what he has said to me so far, however, I do not think he would be ok with the power if it didn't name type and tag. I think his issues are far more broad than, "it informs the player of type and tag," or he would have just told me, "I don't plan to tell you what tag the humanoids in the area are." Quite frankly, I think he would be equally annoyed to have to regularly tell me, "there are 28 humanoids 5 miles to the east, 13 4 miles to the west, over 100 back south in the direction of the city you just came from, and 1 dragon 4 miles north of you." [COLOR=#000000] [/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] The fact that you find it easy is irrelevant. Point is, what he would have to do to adjudicate the power as written makes the game less fun for him, no matter what you think about that. In fact, despite pukunui's examples, he has said that holds true for him as well. That is a valuable observation in and of itself. If enough players share that subjective opinion of the power as written, it should be modified before appearing in official print. If it is a subjective opinion only held by a vast minority, that minority can houserule as required to fix the problem. That is all. This is just anecdotal feedback from my table, which makes me question why you are trying so hard to argue that this anecdotal feedback should not be considered valid. I can't figure out what YOUR goal is in this thread. Are you saying that the subjective feedback from my table is "wrong," and we do not have the "right" to feel the way we do? If not, what are you trying to argue with? Can you please explain your motivation and what you are hoping to achieve? Perhaps that would help resolve this discussion... [/COLOR] I agree. I believe that this is probably why, up to now, my DM has allowed me to learn what I want to learn without forcing me to make any rolls. The fact remains, however, that the power as written made his hairs stand on end and make him leery of its use. It sounds like a lot of other people have a similar problem, though I can't be certain. I would rather it didn't do that to my DM, let alone a lot of other people. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revised Ranger Play Report... (level 3 to 4, beastmaster)
Top