Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GlassJaw" data-source="post: 7475074" data-attributes="member: 22103">Add me to the list that's not a fan of this tweet. Regardless of your feelings on the revised ranger, it was condescending and snooty. And if there are no plans to finished the revised ranger, he could have certainly communicated that in a better way. It's almost as if he was insulted to even have to answer the question.Now that that's out of the way, I don't get his answer. Do they lack so much bandwidth that they can't continue to tweak the ranger - or any other class for that matter - and put out UA articles? Even if nothing is AL legal, it at least gives great insight into the design process and offers more player options. It also keeps people who are asking for changes happy.It also feels like a hard shift in their philosophy. They seemed to be very open-minded about what they were offering in the UA articles. But now this tweet suddenly feels like a shift in that philosophy. I certainly hope that isn't the case.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GlassJaw, post: 7475074, member: 22103"] Add me to the list that's not a fan of this tweet. Regardless of your feelings on the revised ranger, it was condescending and snooty. And if there are no plans to finished the revised ranger, he could have certainly communicated that in a better way. It's almost as if he was insulted to even have to answer the question. Now that that's out of the way, I don't get his answer. Do they lack so much bandwidth that they can't continue to tweak the ranger - or any other class for that matter - and put out UA articles? Even if nothing is AL legal, it at least gives great insight into the design process and offers more player options. It also keeps people who are asking for changes happy. It also feels like a hard shift in their philosophy. They seemed to be very open-minded about what they were offering in the UA articles. But now this tweet suddenly feels like a shift in that philosophy. I certainly hope that isn't the case. [/QUOTE]

Verification