Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revised Ranger update
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pming" data-source="post: 7475242" data-attributes="member: 45197"><p>Hiya.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Changes nothing. At all.</p><p></p><p>I'm not arguing that what you pointed out isn't true. I said, in the quote of mine you posted: <em>... the SECOND something is written saying "The Ranger uses an action to command the pet"</em>.</p><p></p><p>That was the entire point. That a DM who reads that "must command...Action" line in the PHB and doesn't apply the same standard to every other animal in the entire D&D universe, is being a moron. I mean, when the PC's are in a goblin cave and the goblins ambush them. The goblins first send in their 3 worgs, then they shoot arrows, then next round move in to melee. Three goblins don't "hold back so they can command the worgs". The worgs are trained to attack intruders and the worgs, presumably, "like" the goblins (to some degree anyway). Or when the PC's move out of the way when walking down the street to make room for a half-dozen mounted knights of the realm...the PC's don't hear the knights shouting "Move" or kicking/squeezing their heels every 10 seconds to keep the horses moving.</p><p></p><p>Why? Because animals behave as they should behave...except when a well trained one is told <u>not</u> to behave as it naturally would. This simple fact is lost to the so-called DM's I was talking about. It is bad DM'ing (and totally unfair) to apply different standards to the same thing based on who or what is working with it. </p><p></p><p>To me, it's the same as if a DM said "Everyone make a Strength check to hold on. DC 12, except for the Barbarian...yours is 12 but at Disadvantage; use your Rage to remove that". That would make no sense and be unfair. "Ok Presto, you can cast your spell as your pet mastiff attacks the orc coming at you. Longstrider the Beastmaster? Your pet mastiff just lays there and get's attacked because you lost your action this round...oh, right, it gets attacked with Advantage because it's prone. You haven't told it to get up since arriving two days ago". <-- NO SENSE.</p><p></p><p>If you can't see why I'm saying that DM's interpreting "must use his action to command" to mean "must use his action to command the animal every 10 seconds or it stops doing everything and ignores all surrounding environmental factors even if this kills it or lets the beastmaster die", then so be it. I would bet dimes to dollars that there are tens of thousands of DM's out there who have no problem with the Beastmaster because they run the pet as being AT LEAST as smart as a well-trained animal. If your DM is running it as a mindless automaton...well, as I said, it's not a problem with the class; it's a problem with your DM.</p><p></p><p>As for "But it's IN the RULES!"...D&D has one overriding rule. It's called "The DM". In 5e, much like in BECMI or 1e (and to a slightly lesser extent, 2e), the smooth running of a game session REQUIRES that the DM be an active "rule" in the sense that he/she must use their own brainpower to think about the situation and apply any rule appropriately. </p><p></p><p>^_^</p><p></p><p>Paul L. Ming</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pming, post: 7475242, member: 45197"] Hiya. Changes nothing. At all. I'm not arguing that what you pointed out isn't true. I said, in the quote of mine you posted: [I]... the SECOND something is written saying "The Ranger uses an action to command the pet"[/I]. That was the entire point. That a DM who reads that "must command...Action" line in the PHB and doesn't apply the same standard to every other animal in the entire D&D universe, is being a moron. I mean, when the PC's are in a goblin cave and the goblins ambush them. The goblins first send in their 3 worgs, then they shoot arrows, then next round move in to melee. Three goblins don't "hold back so they can command the worgs". The worgs are trained to attack intruders and the worgs, presumably, "like" the goblins (to some degree anyway). Or when the PC's move out of the way when walking down the street to make room for a half-dozen mounted knights of the realm...the PC's don't hear the knights shouting "Move" or kicking/squeezing their heels every 10 seconds to keep the horses moving. Why? Because animals behave as they should behave...except when a well trained one is told [U]not[/U] to behave as it naturally would. This simple fact is lost to the so-called DM's I was talking about. It is bad DM'ing (and totally unfair) to apply different standards to the same thing based on who or what is working with it. To me, it's the same as if a DM said "Everyone make a Strength check to hold on. DC 12, except for the Barbarian...yours is 12 but at Disadvantage; use your Rage to remove that". That would make no sense and be unfair. "Ok Presto, you can cast your spell as your pet mastiff attacks the orc coming at you. Longstrider the Beastmaster? Your pet mastiff just lays there and get's attacked because you lost your action this round...oh, right, it gets attacked with Advantage because it's prone. You haven't told it to get up since arriving two days ago". <-- NO SENSE. If you can't see why I'm saying that DM's interpreting "must use his action to command" to mean "must use his action to command the animal every 10 seconds or it stops doing everything and ignores all surrounding environmental factors even if this kills it or lets the beastmaster die", then so be it. I would bet dimes to dollars that there are tens of thousands of DM's out there who have no problem with the Beastmaster because they run the pet as being AT LEAST as smart as a well-trained animal. If your DM is running it as a mindless automaton...well, as I said, it's not a problem with the class; it's a problem with your DM. As for "But it's IN the RULES!"...D&D has one overriding rule. It's called "The DM". In 5e, much like in BECMI or 1e (and to a slightly lesser extent, 2e), the smooth running of a game session REQUIRES that the DM be an active "rule" in the sense that he/she must use their own brainpower to think about the situation and apply any rule appropriately. ^_^ Paul L. Ming [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revised Ranger update
Top