Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Revised Ranger: Yup, time for a poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 888630" data-attributes="member: 5100"><p>I wasn't making a 1:1 comparison. I didn't think I needed to clarify that.</p><p></p><p>I've just seen a lot of people saying that the Ranger needs to be more like a Rogue and less like a Fighter. I completely disagree. Other than some stealth, I don't think the Ranger should resemble a Rogue much at all. A Ranger should look as much like a Fighter as the Paladin or Barbarian does, though, and should be just as geared toward fighting as either one of those (and don't say "But then it'd just be a Fighter," because by that argument, neither the Paladin or Barbarian should exist, either).</p><p></p><p>This new Ranger is about 50% Fighter and about 50% Rogue. That's about 25% too much Rouge, IMHO.</p><p></p><p>Don't get me wrong, though. The class is awesome. I like that they're mixing up the BAB and the Hit Dice some (why do all/only d10s and up have a 1:1 BAB and all only d4s have a 1:2 BAB and all/only d6s and d8s have a 3:4 BAB?). I like some of the interesting abilities. I'd be more than happy to play it.</p><p></p><p>I just don't think the word "Ranger" fits it very well. With this class, there really isn't a spot for a true Ranger, though. They should just call this class something else (Hunter? Scout?) and forget Ranger ever existed.</p><p></p><p>FWIW, if we're going for a Ranger, I really don't see Evasion. Uncanny Dodge makes _much_ more sense. I also think that virtual feats is an absolutely worthless (took me a second to find a nice word) mechanic -- either give 'em the feat or don't, no exceptions. And, if I understand the Combat Path correctly, I hate the idea that a choice at 2nd level also sets a variable at 6th and 11th. Bonus feats should have been used instead, if for no other reason than Alertness and Stealthy make as much (if not more) sense for a Ranger than TWF -- and it would fix both the virtual feat problem and the 2nd level choice sets the 6th/11th level choice.</p><p></p><p>You asked for opinions and that's mine. Take it or leave it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercule, post: 888630, member: 5100"] I wasn't making a 1:1 comparison. I didn't think I needed to clarify that. I've just seen a lot of people saying that the Ranger needs to be more like a Rogue and less like a Fighter. I completely disagree. Other than some stealth, I don't think the Ranger should resemble a Rogue much at all. A Ranger should look as much like a Fighter as the Paladin or Barbarian does, though, and should be just as geared toward fighting as either one of those (and don't say "But then it'd just be a Fighter," because by that argument, neither the Paladin or Barbarian should exist, either). This new Ranger is about 50% Fighter and about 50% Rogue. That's about 25% too much Rouge, IMHO. Don't get me wrong, though. The class is awesome. I like that they're mixing up the BAB and the Hit Dice some (why do all/only d10s and up have a 1:1 BAB and all only d4s have a 1:2 BAB and all/only d6s and d8s have a 3:4 BAB?). I like some of the interesting abilities. I'd be more than happy to play it. I just don't think the word "Ranger" fits it very well. With this class, there really isn't a spot for a true Ranger, though. They should just call this class something else (Hunter? Scout?) and forget Ranger ever existed. FWIW, if we're going for a Ranger, I really don't see Evasion. Uncanny Dodge makes _much_ more sense. I also think that virtual feats is an absolutely worthless (took me a second to find a nice word) mechanic -- either give 'em the feat or don't, no exceptions. And, if I understand the Combat Path correctly, I hate the idea that a choice at 2nd level also sets a variable at 6th and 11th. Bonus feats should have been used instead, if for no other reason than Alertness and Stealthy make as much (if not more) sense for a Ranger than TWF -- and it would fix both the virtual feat problem and the 2nd level choice sets the 6th/11th level choice. You asked for opinions and that's mine. Take it or leave it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Revised Ranger: Yup, time for a poll
Top