Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Revised Ranger: Yup, time for a poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 895125" data-attributes="member: 5100"><p>The idea of a basic class built around raging doesn't really seem to have a place in _my_ setting, so I was willing to pass on the the Barbarian class. Also, as I thought about what a Ranger should be, I discovered that the Barbarian class infringed a bit on his niche (notice which class gets first rigts). Between the two, I decided the Barbarian just didn't have a place, so I dumped it.</p><p></p><p>I could see where someone might want to keep the Barbarian class. Or where my Ranger might be too martial. I'd be _very_ surprised if my Ranger were ever held up by many as the ideal. I'm not sure that even I think it's "just right", but it comes close enough that people who look at it can get a good idea of what I see when someone says "Ranger".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nah. Nothing new or radical in my Ranger. A fair amount of that, I'm sure, is that people don't seem to think anything is new and radical if it isn't supernatural, and I think a Ranger should emphasize the mundane over the supernatural.</p><p></p><p>As far as siphoning off other class abilities, I don't really think that charge holds much weight. I didn't siphon the Barbarian's skills any more than the current Ranger siphonned the Monk's. I created a rather tough, stealthy, extraordinarily difficult to surprise wilderness warrior. The Barbarian is an amazingly tough, battle-crazed, extraordinarily difficult to surprise wild warrior. There are bound to be similarities.</p><p></p><p>If I were to do it over, I'd probably give Woodland Stride instead of +10 movement. I'd also add the Fast Tracking that the 3.5 Ranger has.</p><p></p><p>I got Uncanny Dodge because, IMHO, that's a no-brainer for a Ranger. I don't really see it for the Barbarian. Regardless, it wasn't a swipe, just a coinsidence.</p><p></p><p>That leaves DR as something the two share. To be honest, I wasn't sure I should add it. I've been saying, though, that I thought the Ranger should be slightly tougher than the Fighter, but not in terms of a higher HD type. I don't like the idea of two PC classes having DR, but once I realized I was pitching the Barbarian, it seemed a reasonable addition. Still, if I had to drop one feature of the class, DR would easily be the one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercule, post: 895125, member: 5100"] The idea of a basic class built around raging doesn't really seem to have a place in _my_ setting, so I was willing to pass on the the Barbarian class. Also, as I thought about what a Ranger should be, I discovered that the Barbarian class infringed a bit on his niche (notice which class gets first rigts). Between the two, I decided the Barbarian just didn't have a place, so I dumped it. I could see where someone might want to keep the Barbarian class. Or where my Ranger might be too martial. I'd be _very_ surprised if my Ranger were ever held up by many as the ideal. I'm not sure that even I think it's "just right", but it comes close enough that people who look at it can get a good idea of what I see when someone says "Ranger". Nah. Nothing new or radical in my Ranger. A fair amount of that, I'm sure, is that people don't seem to think anything is new and radical if it isn't supernatural, and I think a Ranger should emphasize the mundane over the supernatural. As far as siphoning off other class abilities, I don't really think that charge holds much weight. I didn't siphon the Barbarian's skills any more than the current Ranger siphonned the Monk's. I created a rather tough, stealthy, extraordinarily difficult to surprise wilderness warrior. The Barbarian is an amazingly tough, battle-crazed, extraordinarily difficult to surprise wild warrior. There are bound to be similarities. If I were to do it over, I'd probably give Woodland Stride instead of +10 movement. I'd also add the Fast Tracking that the 3.5 Ranger has. I got Uncanny Dodge because, IMHO, that's a no-brainer for a Ranger. I don't really see it for the Barbarian. Regardless, it wasn't a swipe, just a coinsidence. That leaves DR as something the two share. To be honest, I wasn't sure I should add it. I've been saying, though, that I thought the Ranger should be slightly tougher than the Fighter, but not in terms of a higher HD type. I don't like the idea of two PC classes having DR, but once I realized I was pitching the Barbarian, it seemed a reasonable addition. Still, if I had to drop one feature of the class, DR would easily be the one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Revised Ranger: Yup, time for a poll
Top