Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Revision to Dragon article Class Act Rangers?!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ProfessorCirno" data-source="post: 4874913" data-attributes="member: 65637"><p>Comments regarding CPsi include "Wow, they didn't even know how psionics works," "Wow, did they even have an editor," and "Wow, did they just ask the people making it to ensure psionics can never touch wizards and clerics?"</p><p></p><p>Example: The lurk class. It's designed as a sort of psionic assassin, only as a base class. Ignoring the huge faults in it mechanically, such as a skill monkey with only 4+ skill points and no innate trapfinding, we come across two big problems.</p><p></p><p>1) Lurk DC for all their abilities is 10+int modifier. That's it. No +class, no +1/2 class. Just 10+int modifier. And that's for ALL their abilities. See the problem there?</p><p></p><p>2) The Lurk is described as having the reach ability. It's listed <strong>more then once</strong>. Only the ability itself is never explained. WotC eventually answered what it does: Nothing. It was cut. Only they <strong>never removed it from the lists and tables.</strong></p><p></p><p>Example: Practiced Manifestor. They took the practiced spellcaster feat and changed one or two words. Ok, but here's the problem: the feat says "Does not increase your powers per day."</p><p></p><p>Uh. What?</p><p></p><p>Powers per day?</p><p></p><p>Oh good grief, they really did just <strong>literally copy-paste</strong> Practiced Spellcaster and replaced the words.</p><p></p><p>Those are just three examples of CPsi really screwed up editing wise. There's a <em>lot</em> more. Now include the fact that most of the feats are all <strong>the same thing</strong> - add x weapon to your mind blade. Thanks. We couldn't get just <em>one feat</em> that says that? You had to make 4? Oh hey, look, you made a feat for each and every racial ability to add 3 more uses per day. <em>That couldn't be just one feat? - </em>some really, really iffy fluff on the new classes, and the fact that, of the three new base classes, two were originally ONE class that was split because <em>it didn't suck enough</em>, the "errata" that only exists to nerf psionics to the ground (Oh yes, psionic powers now <strong>suffer from DR. That makes sense. That's something that all spellcasters have to deal with</strong>. Oh yes, the psionic variant of <em>summon x</em> can now summon <strong>only one. That makes sense. That's something that all <em>summon x</em> spells have. Right?</strong>), and, to top it all off, <strong>more then half the material was recycled</strong>...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>...actually, to condense it all into one sentance: Despite being the ONLY other fully Psionics book that was ever released in 3.5, pretty much all psionics fans have completely disowned it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ProfessorCirno, post: 4874913, member: 65637"] Comments regarding CPsi include "Wow, they didn't even know how psionics works," "Wow, did they even have an editor," and "Wow, did they just ask the people making it to ensure psionics can never touch wizards and clerics?" Example: The lurk class. It's designed as a sort of psionic assassin, only as a base class. Ignoring the huge faults in it mechanically, such as a skill monkey with only 4+ skill points and no innate trapfinding, we come across two big problems. 1) Lurk DC for all their abilities is 10+int modifier. That's it. No +class, no +1/2 class. Just 10+int modifier. And that's for ALL their abilities. See the problem there? 2) The Lurk is described as having the reach ability. It's listed [B]more then once[/B]. Only the ability itself is never explained. WotC eventually answered what it does: Nothing. It was cut. Only they [B]never removed it from the lists and tables.[/B] Example: Practiced Manifestor. They took the practiced spellcaster feat and changed one or two words. Ok, but here's the problem: the feat says "Does not increase your powers per day." Uh. What? Powers per day? Oh good grief, they really did just [B]literally copy-paste[/B] Practiced Spellcaster and replaced the words. Those are just three examples of CPsi really screwed up editing wise. There's a [I]lot[/I] more. Now include the fact that most of the feats are all [B]the same thing[/B] - add x weapon to your mind blade. Thanks. We couldn't get just [I]one feat[/I] that says that? You had to make 4? Oh hey, look, you made a feat for each and every racial ability to add 3 more uses per day. [I]That couldn't be just one feat? - [/I]some really, really iffy fluff on the new classes, and the fact that, of the three new base classes, two were originally ONE class that was split because [I]it didn't suck enough[/I], the "errata" that only exists to nerf psionics to the ground (Oh yes, psionic powers now [B]suffer from DR. That makes sense. That's something that all spellcasters have to deal with[/B]. Oh yes, the psionic variant of [I]summon x[/I] can now summon [B]only one. That makes sense. That's something that all [I]summon x[/I] spells have. Right?[/B]), and, to top it all off, [B]more then half the material was recycled[/B]... ...actually, to condense it all into one sentance: Despite being the ONLY other fully Psionics book that was ever released in 3.5, pretty much all psionics fans have completely disowned it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Revision to Dragon article Class Act Rangers?!
Top