Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revisiting RAW Darkness Spell
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8257074" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>Well, 5e was explicitly <em>designed</em> to rely on common sense, Jeremy Crawford just changed tactics for how he answers rules questions. Shortly after the release of 5e, Sage Advice started out as a weekly column on the WotC site, and the very first one had a lengthy discussion about how any rules question really had three answers: rules a written, rules as intended, and rules as fun. And the first few questions he answered went into all three.</p><p></p><p>For example, the original Sage Advice answer to the question of if Trance allows elves finish a long rest in only four hours was that it was a reasonable interpretation of the RAW, but the RAI was only for it to give them more time during a long rest to perform light activity rather than sleep, and that if you think allowing elves to take a long rest in only 4 hours would be RAF, that’s probably fine balance wise, but keep in mind the worldbuilding implications, because if elves heal and recover spells twice as quickly as everyone else, their society is likely to be militarily superior to everyone else’s.</p><p></p><p>Of course, somewhere along the line, probably because he realized it would be untenable to go into this kind of detail about every rules question, he completely stopped bothering with RAI and RAF and just gave the most literal RAW interpretation possible for every question. Even changed the official answer to the trance question to a straightforward “yes” after the errata to the long rest wording.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8257074, member: 6779196"] Well, 5e was explicitly [I]designed[/I] to rely on common sense, Jeremy Crawford just changed tactics for how he answers rules questions. Shortly after the release of 5e, Sage Advice started out as a weekly column on the WotC site, and the very first one had a lengthy discussion about how any rules question really had three answers: rules a written, rules as intended, and rules as fun. And the first few questions he answered went into all three. For example, the original Sage Advice answer to the question of if Trance allows elves finish a long rest in only four hours was that it was a reasonable interpretation of the RAW, but the RAI was only for it to give them more time during a long rest to perform light activity rather than sleep, and that if you think allowing elves to take a long rest in only 4 hours would be RAF, that’s probably fine balance wise, but keep in mind the worldbuilding implications, because if elves heal and recover spells twice as quickly as everyone else, their society is likely to be militarily superior to everyone else’s. Of course, somewhere along the line, probably because he realized it would be untenable to go into this kind of detail about every rules question, he completely stopped bothering with RAI and RAF and just gave the most literal RAW interpretation possible for every question. Even changed the official answer to the trance question to a straightforward “yes” after the errata to the long rest wording. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revisiting RAW Darkness Spell
Top