Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FitzTheRuke" data-source="post: 8261461" data-attributes="member: 59816">Sure, something like that. The exact level of &quot;dimmed&quot; would be up to whatever you feel comfortable with counting as &quot;not enough obscurement to count mechanically as heavily obscured&quot; (for the woman) and &quot;enough obscurement to count mechanically as heavily obscured&quot; (for the man). You can see her well enough to shoot her without disadvantage, and you can see him poorly enough to have disadvantage on shooting him. From my (perhaps &quot;our&quot; when we keep talking about &quot;sides&quot;) perspective, that means she's dark and he's darker, but she's not GONE and nor is he. Again, I (we?) feel that the Inkblot side seems to be insisting that he has to be absolutely black to be &quot;heavily obscured&quot; and she has to be absolutely bright to not be. (And would be utterly gone too, if the area of the spell is in front of her).I'm an artist too and I absolutely could paint what I'm talking about. I assume that you really, fundamentally just can't grasp what I'm saying, for whatever reason. I have no idea why this is, but it has nothing to do with &quot;top-down&quot; playing or whatever, I play mostly theatre-of-the-mind.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FitzTheRuke, post: 8261461, member: 59816"] Sure, something like that. The exact level of "dimmed" would be up to whatever you feel comfortable with counting as "not enough obscurement to count mechanically as heavily obscured" (for the woman) and "enough obscurement to count mechanically as heavily obscured" (for the man). You can see her well enough to shoot her without disadvantage, and you can see him poorly enough to have disadvantage on shooting him. From my (perhaps "our" when we keep talking about "sides") perspective, that means she's dark and he's darker, but she's not GONE and nor is he. Again, I (we?) feel that the Inkblot side seems to be insisting that he has to be absolutely black to be "heavily obscured" and she has to be absolutely bright to not be. (And would be utterly gone too, if the area of the spell is in front of her). I'm an artist too and I absolutely could paint what I'm talking about. I assume that you really, fundamentally just can't grasp what I'm saying, for whatever reason. I have no idea why this is, but it has nothing to do with "top-down" playing or whatever, I play mostly theatre-of-the-mind. [/QUOTE]

Verification