Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Reworking Favored Enemy and 'Precision' damage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Notmousse" data-source="post: 4161180" data-attributes="member: 39739"><p>Preamble (or Ramble, I'll point out where I get to game theory).</p><p></p><p>Maybe I should've worded it the other way around, but I submit that both work on the same (or at least similar) principle.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Both the Ranger and Rogue fight more effectively against certain targets due to a knowledge of their enemies. The Ranger takes a detailed study of certain creature types to gain a static advantage in damage. The Rogue on the other hand has a broader sense of 'soft spots' to stick the 'pointy end' of their weapons which applies across a(n initially) broader group than the Ranger, but as a much more variable advantage, more obvious from 5th level onwards.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Having played in Living Greyhawk as both a Rogue and a Ranger (Fighter, Swashbuckler, Ex-Bard in the truest sense of the word... all in one character), I've found my character woefully inept when facing an unusually large portion of the opposition (Undead caused my dip into Ranger for the FE allowing me the chance to beat DR, and/or cause more damage than a crossbow wielding sorcerer).</p><p></p><p>This doesn't follow in game logic on several points in my mind as in most cases even the critical immune have structural weaknesses, or a center if nothing else. </p><p></p><p>Given the above, I thought to how to correct this (I'm not convinced 4e is my cup of tea, and that's all I say of it) and believe I have the roots for a solution with finesse.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>Actual content ahead! Skip to here if you don't care why I'm bringing this up.</p><p></p><p>My solution is to allow the Knowledge skills associated with monster types to determine the amount of FE and SA allowed against them, with set maximums attributed to level.</p><p></p><p>I haven't tossed this into serious playtest or statistical analysis, but feel this is a fine starting point.</p><p></p><p>For Rangers the amount of bonus damage would be relevant knowledge skill, with a limit of level / 2 +1, while the number of FE would still be limited as per PHB. This allows a Ranger to 'specialize' in a certain type of monsters quite efficiently (Elementals come immediately to mind) while also allowing later FE choices to continue to be of some importance rather than background with a nod to statistical influence.</p><p></p><p>Rogues and other precision damage dealers would be along the lines of +1d6 per every rank in the relevant knowledge skill with a limit of level / 2 +1. This would be required only of types that are immune to critical hits, but may be applied to a normally vulnerable target with magical (or other) assistance.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>Alternatively (for those who believe the above to be unbalancing, or simply love to roll dice)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Ranger bonus damage to be equal to relevant knowledge skill check / 2.5 (or +2 for every 5 if you prefer).</p><p></p><p>Rogue & Co. would be equal to relevant knowledge skill check / 2.5 per d6.</p><p></p><p>In both cases no limit to bonus damage given the increased burden to obtain them (feats, skill points, intelligence, and items to enhance the former).</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>C&C (and flames) requested.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Notmousse, post: 4161180, member: 39739"] Preamble (or Ramble, I'll point out where I get to game theory). Maybe I should've worded it the other way around, but I submit that both work on the same (or at least similar) principle. Both the Ranger and Rogue fight more effectively against certain targets due to a knowledge of their enemies. The Ranger takes a detailed study of certain creature types to gain a static advantage in damage. The Rogue on the other hand has a broader sense of 'soft spots' to stick the 'pointy end' of their weapons which applies across a(n initially) broader group than the Ranger, but as a much more variable advantage, more obvious from 5th level onwards. Having played in Living Greyhawk as both a Rogue and a Ranger (Fighter, Swashbuckler, Ex-Bard in the truest sense of the word... all in one character), I've found my character woefully inept when facing an unusually large portion of the opposition (Undead caused my dip into Ranger for the FE allowing me the chance to beat DR, and/or cause more damage than a crossbow wielding sorcerer). This doesn't follow in game logic on several points in my mind as in most cases even the critical immune have structural weaknesses, or a center if nothing else. Given the above, I thought to how to correct this (I'm not convinced 4e is my cup of tea, and that's all I say of it) and believe I have the roots for a solution with finesse. --- Actual content ahead! Skip to here if you don't care why I'm bringing this up. My solution is to allow the Knowledge skills associated with monster types to determine the amount of FE and SA allowed against them, with set maximums attributed to level. I haven't tossed this into serious playtest or statistical analysis, but feel this is a fine starting point. For Rangers the amount of bonus damage would be relevant knowledge skill, with a limit of level / 2 +1, while the number of FE would still be limited as per PHB. This allows a Ranger to 'specialize' in a certain type of monsters quite efficiently (Elementals come immediately to mind) while also allowing later FE choices to continue to be of some importance rather than background with a nod to statistical influence. Rogues and other precision damage dealers would be along the lines of +1d6 per every rank in the relevant knowledge skill with a limit of level / 2 +1. This would be required only of types that are immune to critical hits, but may be applied to a normally vulnerable target with magical (or other) assistance. --- Alternatively (for those who believe the above to be unbalancing, or simply love to roll dice) Ranger bonus damage to be equal to relevant knowledge skill check / 2.5 (or +2 for every 5 if you prefer). Rogue & Co. would be equal to relevant knowledge skill check / 2.5 per d6. In both cases no limit to bonus damage given the increased burden to obtain them (feats, skill points, intelligence, and items to enhance the former). --- C&C (and flames) requested. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Reworking Favored Enemy and 'Precision' damage
Top