Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 1801869" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I don't think there's lack of interest. But this sortof heavy changes are very hard to evaluate balance-wise, especially when they are attempted all at the same time. Rewriting combat, rewriting classes, rewriting magic... each of these are challenging enough, and you want to do all of them at the same time&nbsp; <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/nervous.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":heh:" title="Nervous Laugh&nbsp; &nbsp; :heh:" data-shortname=":heh:" /> Don't be surprised if it sounds somewhat intimidating to even the regular posters of the house rules forum&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> If you want more participation, I suggest you break down each of them into separate topics on different threads (mentioning what else is going to change in the rules), and of course as soon as you write more details about your ideas you'll get lots of opinions!</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 1801869, member: 1465"] I don't think there's lack of interest. But this sortof heavy changes are very hard to evaluate balance-wise, especially when they are attempted all at the same time. Rewriting combat, rewriting classes, rewriting magic... each of these are challenging enough, and you want to do all of them at the same time :heh: Don't be surprised if it sounds somewhat intimidating to even the regular posters of the house rules forum ;) If you want more participation, I suggest you break down each of them into separate topics on different threads (mentioning what else is going to change in the rules), and of course as soon as you write more details about your ideas you'll get lots of opinions! [/QUOTE]

Verification