Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rewriting the Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grail Quest" data-source="post: 1802047" data-attributes="member: 21364"><p>I think game balance is an illusion. There is just so much stuff out there that nothing can truly be evaluated for balance. Part of the difficulty is synergy. Even in a partial point-system that 3E and 3.5E are using, you can have better or worse combinations. And when a player puts together a particularly good combination of feats and classes, whether deliberately or by chance, is there something out of balance?</p><p>The truth is all we can do is not deliberately unbalance things. The rest of it is massaging things into something reasonable that won't break the fun of a game for everyone else in the game group.</p><p></p><p>In every game, I believe every DM has a sense of what the type of action is supposed to be like. The PHB presents a benchmark that just doesn't work for everybody. The problem comes when you try to force it to work across all campaigns. The idea of Core Classes is just such an attempt. There is nothing "core" about them. Every single character class, core or prestige, carries with it an innate culture--a set of assumptions about what the gaming world will be like. And it all makes sense only if you are willing to go along with that.</p><p>You can only break out of that by going pure-point system, IMO (something like using the HERO System, or my own "D10").</p><p></p><p>The main problem of massive rule changes is the time cost. You're not getting paid to do it.</p><p>Part of what makes D&D successful is that it has the illusion of catering to a broad audience, when really it does these things:</p><p>(a) Sets a benchmark. What D&D has more or less always done is get people to play the game _their_ way. Whenever you do this, you limit imagination, but you cannot produce sourcebooks that work together without doing this. And if you cannot produce enough material that sells, your company will die.</p><p></p><p>(b) Uses a shotgun approach. Once it has stabilized the feel of a game, it starts throwing out stuff to see what people are interested in. Then it keeps throwing more of that until people get sick of it.</p><p>The idea of Prestige Classes, for example--people want to customize, customize, customize. Why? Because core classes aren't so core. They just don't cut it. Prestige Classes are a great way of releasing the imagination that was held back, while making products that sell. After all, you need such-and-such a sourcebook to tell you what the class progression is, right?</p><p>Which isn't as sinister as it sounds: without people telling you these class progressions, you might never have come up with them in the first place. Despite all the activity on the House Rule boards, the mass of the human race lacks initiative and imagination. (Why do you think self-improvement public speakers are so popular?)</p><p></p><p>Anyway, my free-to-download total conversion project is here: <a href="http://www.freewebs.com/d20elements" target="_blank">www.freewebs.com/d20elements</a> if you want to see someone who's restless about D20. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grail Quest, post: 1802047, member: 21364"] I think game balance is an illusion. There is just so much stuff out there that nothing can truly be evaluated for balance. Part of the difficulty is synergy. Even in a partial point-system that 3E and 3.5E are using, you can have better or worse combinations. And when a player puts together a particularly good combination of feats and classes, whether deliberately or by chance, is there something out of balance? The truth is all we can do is not deliberately unbalance things. The rest of it is massaging things into something reasonable that won't break the fun of a game for everyone else in the game group. In every game, I believe every DM has a sense of what the type of action is supposed to be like. The PHB presents a benchmark that just doesn't work for everybody. The problem comes when you try to force it to work across all campaigns. The idea of Core Classes is just such an attempt. There is nothing "core" about them. Every single character class, core or prestige, carries with it an innate culture--a set of assumptions about what the gaming world will be like. And it all makes sense only if you are willing to go along with that. You can only break out of that by going pure-point system, IMO (something like using the HERO System, or my own "D10"). The main problem of massive rule changes is the time cost. You're not getting paid to do it. Part of what makes D&D successful is that it has the illusion of catering to a broad audience, when really it does these things: (a) Sets a benchmark. What D&D has more or less always done is get people to play the game _their_ way. Whenever you do this, you limit imagination, but you cannot produce sourcebooks that work together without doing this. And if you cannot produce enough material that sells, your company will die. (b) Uses a shotgun approach. Once it has stabilized the feel of a game, it starts throwing out stuff to see what people are interested in. Then it keeps throwing more of that until people get sick of it. The idea of Prestige Classes, for example--people want to customize, customize, customize. Why? Because core classes aren't so core. They just don't cut it. Prestige Classes are a great way of releasing the imagination that was held back, while making products that sell. After all, you need such-and-such a sourcebook to tell you what the class progression is, right? Which isn't as sinister as it sounds: without people telling you these class progressions, you might never have come up with them in the first place. Despite all the activity on the House Rule boards, the mass of the human race lacks initiative and imagination. (Why do you think self-improvement public speakers are so popular?) Anyway, my free-to-download total conversion project is here: [url]www.freewebs.com/d20elements[/url] if you want to see someone who's restless about D20. :p [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rewriting the Rules
Top