Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 3780995" data-attributes="member: 1465">Ah, thank you  :\ Yes, maybe 10 points of range are too much. But I think that the standard range of 1 is too small to make much sense. Make it 5, or whatever you want (I prefer fixed than adding one more variable into the rule, but that's just me).I think you're missing the main point in fact, which is to (almost) remove permanent death without having to keep really resurrecting people. Just stop calling it death, call it "so damaged that you're out of the game for a while, and get a permanent penalty as a punishment" (and call Raise Dead something else if it bothers you). The penalty, by the way, could be optional and it's easily removable if a gaming group doesn't want it. This house rule is based on the fact that many of those who hate resurrection, in reality they hate the image of it: they hate to think that it's easy to die and come back from the dead multiple times, because it feels too cheesy. They don't necessarily hate the idea that permanent death is very rare (for those who instead want permanent death common, then there is no benefit for this house rule).</blockquote>