Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 5075759" data-attributes="member: 478">In the light of balanced treasure distribution, I still think it's best if whoever gets something from the party treasury, half the market price should be "paid" for (directly or in lowering the share from the valuables appropriately, or, if not possible otherwise, by going in debt towards the party treasury to be balanced out with future findings).That, BTW, doesn't actually cost you anything... it's just a way to handle treasure distribution. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Like when 4 PCs find 12k gp and a ring of protection +2, one gets the ring and the other three get 4k gp each, so everyone has received a share of 4k gp worth."Buying" items like this is always an advantage, though, especially if you would otherwise actually buy such an item, since the price is only half the market value. If the item would otherwise be sold, the price is identical to the sell value. Either way, you can always cash it out to the appropriate value by selling it, so there is no loss at all.Of course, I also think that items should generally go to whoever can use them best; but some fair and balanced way of distribution certainly doesn't hurt.ByeThanee</blockquote>