Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rich Baker on the Spellplague and other stuff.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IconoclastX" data-source="post: 3992779" data-attributes="member: 56728"><p>I think that the WoW claim is also ridiculous, but I think that gaming settings are a little different.  The problem that everyone who has a problem seems to have is that there is "too much history" for the Realms that they can't get involved.  That seems to indicate to me that it's unlikely for anyone except a fairly strong fan (ie. not someone who just has a passing interest in the setting) to be the heaviest consumer of material and product for the setting.  It is also these "rabid fans" (a term which I only use because it was in the thread to which I replied originally) that a lot of discussion does occur.  A casual fan (who, no doubt, exists, and may also buy a lot of FR material) will likely pick up a FR book (whether because of interest or just for the sake of completeness) and flip through it, maybe use it in a game, then shelf it because they have other settings of interest or are simply a collector.</p><p></p><p>The "rabid fan" will get the book, read it carefully and pick out everything that may be of use (fluff or crunch, depending on the preference of the reader) then review it online, then talk about it on mail lists and on sites like this, discuss with other rabid fans the ins and outs, what effects some fluff might have on the campaigns they're running, etc.</p><p></p><p>I think that a gameworld setting is a little different from WoW (small bingo troll:  although the new version of D&D might suggest otherwise <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ).  Without the centre of hardcore fans, you end up with what might be a marketable product, but not one that generates a lot of interest or excitement.  I think that we can agree there has been a lot of both for the Realms over the years - and that doesn't come from casual fans, collectors, or non-fans.</p><p></p><p>I in no way mean to say that the "rabid fan" is any better than a casual fan or a collector.  In fact it's often a great thing to see casual fans showing an interest in learning more about the setting.  But, like the Trekkies comment indicates, rabid fans can sometimes be a little scary (and, in fact, know what Elminster ate for breakfast on Tuesday as you say <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )  The longevity of rabid fans is what provides that continuity and, IMO, keeps the franchise alive and vibrant (and important in the eyes of those who stand to make money from it).  Your average casual fan will not be bothered to care and may just drift away.  There are obviously exceptions, but that's still how I tend to see it.</p><p></p><p>As for the name... no relation.  Neither to Malcolm X. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IconoclastX, post: 3992779, member: 56728"] I think that the WoW claim is also ridiculous, but I think that gaming settings are a little different. The problem that everyone who has a problem seems to have is that there is "too much history" for the Realms that they can't get involved. That seems to indicate to me that it's unlikely for anyone except a fairly strong fan (ie. not someone who just has a passing interest in the setting) to be the heaviest consumer of material and product for the setting. It is also these "rabid fans" (a term which I only use because it was in the thread to which I replied originally) that a lot of discussion does occur. A casual fan (who, no doubt, exists, and may also buy a lot of FR material) will likely pick up a FR book (whether because of interest or just for the sake of completeness) and flip through it, maybe use it in a game, then shelf it because they have other settings of interest or are simply a collector. The "rabid fan" will get the book, read it carefully and pick out everything that may be of use (fluff or crunch, depending on the preference of the reader) then review it online, then talk about it on mail lists and on sites like this, discuss with other rabid fans the ins and outs, what effects some fluff might have on the campaigns they're running, etc. I think that a gameworld setting is a little different from WoW (small bingo troll: although the new version of D&D might suggest otherwise ;) ). Without the centre of hardcore fans, you end up with what might be a marketable product, but not one that generates a lot of interest or excitement. I think that we can agree there has been a lot of both for the Realms over the years - and that doesn't come from casual fans, collectors, or non-fans. I in no way mean to say that the "rabid fan" is any better than a casual fan or a collector. In fact it's often a great thing to see casual fans showing an interest in learning more about the setting. But, like the Trekkies comment indicates, rabid fans can sometimes be a little scary (and, in fact, know what Elminster ate for breakfast on Tuesday as you say :) ) The longevity of rabid fans is what provides that continuity and, IMO, keeps the franchise alive and vibrant (and important in the eyes of those who stand to make money from it). Your average casual fan will not be bothered to care and may just drift away. There are obviously exceptions, but that's still how I tend to see it. As for the name... no relation. Neither to Malcolm X. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rich Baker on the Spellplague and other stuff.
Top