Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kraydak" data-source="post: 3993336" data-attributes="member: 12306">Those definitions are close enough.  I think a lot of the problems are coming because pieces of FR are getting hacked up.  Even relatively unused portions of FR geography *have fans*.  If you don't *need* to blow them up, why risk alienating those fans?To satisfy those potential FR fans who as scared by the current canon-load, all you need is B (and that only if you think there is a true immortality problem)+TLA.  My feeling is you only need a TLA, but hey, we need 4e rules *anyways*.  Its a freebie.  Note that if these people (likely!) don't want any *more* canon shoved down their throats, they can play before the end of the TLA.  Doing is is, hwoever, made hard by a short TLA and Spellplague A, the current state of 4e FR affairs.  Any campaign set in the current TLA is going to be utterly dominated by A, which nets you little as you have C turn into A even after the TLA.To avoid angering fans of the current FR NPC cast/geography/political climate, all you need is to avoid A.  (people who aren't willing to move to 4e rules aren't worth considering).  This group can ignore the TLA.We aren't going to draw in dedicated FR haters even if we include A, although they certainly won't complain.So why is WotC including A?  Besides them being dedicated FR haters, or them simply not having pondered how to both get new customers AND keep old ones, of course?</blockquote>