Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bonethug0108" data-source="post: 4020201" data-attributes="member: 58528">Where is it said that x is as good at non-intended role y as z?All I said was that classes appear to be able to do things outside their intended role. I never said or have seen mention that a warlock would be just as good a controller as a wizard.Edit:Misread your post(thought you said are).Where have you seen that doing things outside of roles takes away from the main role? Can you not do stuff in addition to your main role and still be the most effective of your group in that role?If both the warlord and cleric get about the same type/amount of buff and heals, but also get some stuff that allows them to move or injure opponents, would they not still be good leaders? If a warlord has many buffs and the wizard has a couple, is the warlord not a more effective healer?I'm not sure where you are drawing your conclusion from anything that has been said.</blockquote>