Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ring of Blades spell
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oryan77" data-source="post: 3280236" data-attributes="member: 18701"><p>Ring of Blades is in the Spell Compendium book. The description text says that "at the beginning of your turn" the blades deal damage to people in it's 5' range around the caster. </p><p></p><p>A player of mine was saying that "beginning of your turn" means on the casters initiative and at the beginning of his initiative only. Meaning, it only hurts someone if that person is already in the threatened square. If the caster has to move (even a 5' move) to get the blades in range of an enemy, then the blades do not hurt the person because you had to move first..so the blades didn't deal damage at the "beginning" of your turn.</p><p></p><p>To keep the game going I agreed that he might be correct. But now that I think about it more carefully, that doesn't make any sense. The spell is a 3rd lvl spell. With his ruling, the only time you'll deal damage is if a guy moves up to attack and can't move again out of range. After that, he can simply make 5' steps after each full attack to keep the blades from hurting him. If the caster approaches someone, the enemy just has to keep making 5' steps each round to force the caster to also make a 5' step which causes the blades to not attack at the beginning of your turn. Seems like a pointless spell to be 3rd level and only deal 1d6 +1 dmg a level (max +10 points).</p><p></p><p>Is he correct about this?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oryan77, post: 3280236, member: 18701"] Ring of Blades is in the Spell Compendium book. The description text says that "at the beginning of your turn" the blades deal damage to people in it's 5' range around the caster. A player of mine was saying that "beginning of your turn" means on the casters initiative and at the beginning of his initiative only. Meaning, it only hurts someone if that person is already in the threatened square. If the caster has to move (even a 5' move) to get the blades in range of an enemy, then the blades do not hurt the person because you had to move first..so the blades didn't deal damage at the "beginning" of your turn. To keep the game going I agreed that he might be correct. But now that I think about it more carefully, that doesn't make any sense. The spell is a 3rd lvl spell. With his ruling, the only time you'll deal damage is if a guy moves up to attack and can't move again out of range. After that, he can simply make 5' steps after each full attack to keep the blades from hurting him. If the caster approaches someone, the enemy just has to keep making 5' steps each round to force the caster to also make a 5' step which causes the blades to not attack at the beginning of your turn. Seems like a pointless spell to be 3rd level and only deal 1d6 +1 dmg a level (max +10 points). Is he correct about this? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ring of Blades spell
Top