Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 175832" data-attributes="member: 2829">Re: Ring of Improved InvisibilityThat's perfectly understandable that it is confusing. I'll break down the ring of invisibility and show you what I mean:Invisibility is a 2nd level spell, minimum caster level of 3rd. Technically, the formula to calculate the cost of this ring would be 2 (spell level) x 3 (caster level) x 2,000gp = a mere 12,000gp. In my opinion, that is a bit low, but not by much. Here is how they fixed it:2 (spell level) x 5 (higher set caster level) x 2,000gp = 20,000gp, which is bit better. Basically, when you are trying to price a ring like this that you make, one of the easiest ways to play with the price is to grab a trusty calculator, or use your omnipotent mathematical genius level brain (that I most certainly do not possess) and calculate it like this:2 x 3 x 2,000gp = 12,000gp - Nah. Too low. How about this?...2 x 4 x 2,000gp = 16,000gp - Nah. Still too low. How about this?...2 x 5 x 2,000gp = 20,000gp - Well. That looks better, but I'm still not sure. How about this?...2 x 6 x 2,000gp = 24,000gp - Nah. That's a bit too high. So, looks like 20,000gp is the lucky number! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Remember, Art, not just Science. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification