Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ring of Spell storing question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ARandomGod" data-source="post: 1879357" data-attributes="member: 17296"><p>Personal predjudice. I mean, here is an item that *should* be useful to a spellcaster. It's the only rechargeable staff or wand like item in the game. And yet it suffers from the fatal flaw of all wands, in that it's not really useful for spellcasters to store spells. Or, at any rate, it's not really useful for them to store spells wherein caster level is important.</p><p></p><p>I mean, it's not like these rings are cheap. You're paying more for a ring of spellstoring than you would be for a set of pearls of power that would do the same thing (in general). Yet the pearls will give you more. Sure, if you're storing infrequently used utility spells that's another story, the rings allow you to have more spells "memorized", literally at your fingertips. But then again, why not just buy scrolls in that case? You'll likely end up using them nearly the same way, you'll keep the rings in a pouch or strategically aligned along your belt so that you can put them on and cast them as if casting from a scroll. If, on the other hand, it's a spell you're planning on using frequently enough to rate actually wearing the ring... then you're likely to want to cast it more than once anyhow... I mean, if you're having that much trouble with alloted number of spells per day it could be useful, but I've never really HAD that kind of trouble. If it's a spell I want to cast frequently I memorize it.</p><p></p><p>Or if you're a non caster, they're great rings. Assuming you've got a caster friend to refill it for you, it gives you casting ability you wouldn't otherwise have. But for a caster, well... it does suck, you've got to admit. As written, it won't do for any of the caster's I've played anything they'd want from it. And so I think it's a lame rule because it's an item that was IMO written FOR a caster, and then they nerfed it to the realm of "with this item you're paying for the ambiance", because you can get better bang for your buck elsewhere.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ARandomGod, post: 1879357, member: 17296"] Personal predjudice. I mean, here is an item that *should* be useful to a spellcaster. It's the only rechargeable staff or wand like item in the game. And yet it suffers from the fatal flaw of all wands, in that it's not really useful for spellcasters to store spells. Or, at any rate, it's not really useful for them to store spells wherein caster level is important. I mean, it's not like these rings are cheap. You're paying more for a ring of spellstoring than you would be for a set of pearls of power that would do the same thing (in general). Yet the pearls will give you more. Sure, if you're storing infrequently used utility spells that's another story, the rings allow you to have more spells "memorized", literally at your fingertips. But then again, why not just buy scrolls in that case? You'll likely end up using them nearly the same way, you'll keep the rings in a pouch or strategically aligned along your belt so that you can put them on and cast them as if casting from a scroll. If, on the other hand, it's a spell you're planning on using frequently enough to rate actually wearing the ring... then you're likely to want to cast it more than once anyhow... I mean, if you're having that much trouble with alloted number of spells per day it could be useful, but I've never really HAD that kind of trouble. If it's a spell I want to cast frequently I memorize it. Or if you're a non caster, they're great rings. Assuming you've got a caster friend to refill it for you, it gives you casting ability you wouldn't otherwise have. But for a caster, well... it does suck, you've got to admit. As written, it won't do for any of the caster's I've played anything they'd want from it. And so I think it's a lame rule because it's an item that was IMO written FOR a caster, and then they nerfed it to the realm of "with this item you're paying for the ambiance", because you can get better bang for your buck elsewhere. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ring of Spell storing question
Top