Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 2739011" data-attributes="member: 31734">Sure it's mentioned.  Spell Turning mentions "original caster."  I apply significances to the word "original" in that, making the (admitted) assumption that there must be a non-original caster as well.  So, if you caster charm person on someone with spell turning and it comes back to you, then you may becomed charmed by that person.  I think that's logical (i.e. normal) and supported in the rules via the given assumption.Without that assumption, then you make another series of assumptions where (1) "original" is superfluous and has no meaning, (2) anywhere you see "original caster" you can replace it with "caster" or vice versa, and (3) the designers provided the extra verbage without the additional intent that "original caster" is somehow different than "caster."That's my take, and perhaps the opposite interpretation has more weight.  I'm merely expressing an alternative viewpoint. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>