Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Storm Raven" data-source="post: 2128353" data-attributes="member: 307">Only in the version you quoted, which was the second set of definitions I provided. In the first version, the first definition runs counter to your assertion, and indeed flatly contradicts it. To wit:In other words, you are picking and choosing, because that definition gives the order you like, while the other doesn't. Which point also demolishes your silly argument that defintions are ordered in some mystical way that makes one more important than another.The physical well-being of the child is not the same as the emotional well-being of the child. I don't see how the odd ruling that a ring that can indefinitely support a fully grown ogre recovering from 22 hit points of regular damage, 18 points of Strength damage, and mummy rot is incapable of supporting an infant in a manner that allows it to grow makes any difference to the emotional well-being of the infant.</blockquote>