Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="the_bruiser" data-source="post: 2131806" data-attributes="member: 6126">Let me make the appropriate disclaimers:&nbsp; IANAD (dietician), YMMV, and i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry I'm really not intending to start a flame war <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />.&nbsp; Obviously a decent number of the community finds this discussion to be reasonable, so maybe I'm on crack.&nbsp; So let me just say that I'm 100% sure that nobody in my campaigns would ever rule this way.&nbsp; Sustenance isn't really a game-defined term, as many of you have pointed out, so this is one of those (dangerous!) situations where we're forced to consider intent.&nbsp; My interpretation of what the ring means:&nbsp; &quot;Hey, when wearing this, pretend like you get all the food you want.&quot;&nbsp; I'll admit that that is a judgment on my part, but on a personal confidence level of how likely I feel my interpretation to be 'right', I'd put this up there around 95%.&nbsp; I.e., I view many of you to be unreasonable in this.&nbsp; I'm only slightly less confident that my view of this is 'right' than I am that I understand what the fly spell means by 'up', even though 'up' isn't a defined game term.&nbsp; Again, err, sorry.&nbsp; I'm trying to find a balance between my shock at this discussion and trying to be respectful, so err, sorry <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="the_bruiser, post: 2131806, member: 6126"] Let me make the appropriate disclaimers: IANAD (dietician), YMMV, and i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry I'm really not intending to start a flame war :). Obviously a decent number of the community finds this discussion to be reasonable, so maybe I'm on crack. So let me just say that I'm 100% sure that nobody in my campaigns would ever rule this way. Sustenance isn't really a game-defined term, as many of you have pointed out, so this is one of those (dangerous!) situations where we're forced to consider intent. My interpretation of what the ring means: "Hey, when wearing this, pretend like you get all the food you want." I'll admit that that is a judgment on my part, but on a personal confidence level of how likely I feel my interpretation to be 'right', I'd put this up there around 95%. I.e., I view many of you to be unreasonable in this. I'm only slightly less confident that my view of this is 'right' than I am that I understand what the fly spell means by 'up', even though 'up' isn't a defined game term. Again, err, sorry. I'm trying to find a balance between my shock at this discussion and trying to be respectful, so err, sorry :). [/QUOTE]

Verification