Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Arcturus_Rugend" data-source="post: 838989" data-attributes="member: 11104">I agreewith the first part of your statement. Uncanny Dodge does help you against invisible attackers, no matter what the nature of their invisibility. The fact that it functions versus invisibility is clearly stated in the feat. The fact that it works against an ability SIMILAR to invisibility is NOT stated in the feat. I'm not sure where you get the information that Uncanny Dodge relies solely on visibility, either.  And I'm also unsure where in the rules it tells you that you may divide an ability or spell effect into components such as "Effect #1" and "Effect #2" unless the spell specifically states that you can consider them separate effects. You are clearly extrapolating your own rationales as to why and how the feats and spell functions when the rules, as they are written, say nothing of the sort. I can appreciate the creative thinking and I even acknowledge that your ideas are coherent and logical. But they are in no way official, because they do not follow the rules as written. I'm not even saying that I would not use your house rule as I think that it is a plausible explanation, but it IS, despite all logic, a house rule.(edited for readability) </blockquote>