Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rings of Power
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jdanovich" data-source="post: 2012085" data-attributes="member: 28357"><p>While I appreciate every reviewer's right to his/her opinion, and I truly thank each and every one for taking the time to showcase products for the benefit of others trying to make an informed decision, I have a couple of pet peeves that continually irk me. First of all, that the basis of this review is to give weight to whether or not the price is worth the product I would comment that the number one factor should always remain content. Yes, the price could have been less. And if Fast Forward were printing tens of thousands of this book the retail price would have been amortized over a much larger print run saving thousands of dollars, and the retail could have been lower. The interior could have been color. Again, more a factor of size of print run versus cost of goods. Fast Forward would love to be able to put the extra bells and whistles into every product that large print runs afford. But until that time the production values will be more conservative. That being said, what part of those production values bring content value to the game? Having full-color interiors are visually pleasing but hardly "add" to the gaming experience, as they are not going to be seen by 90 percent of the gamers these rings would be introduced to. It would just be nice to have. No more, no less. I would be more interested in reading a review about the content rather than the packaging. But then again, I'm one of those people who could give a rat's hind end whether or not something was pretty, I care about the words. </p><p></p><p>Secondly, I am always rubbed the wrong way when a large amount of effort is put into telling about typos and spelling errors. Everybody hates them, especially those that publish for a living. Everybody tries real hard to make sure that they don't happen, and they always seem to slip in, as evidenced in your review (people who live in glass houses...). 'Nuff said. </p><p></p><p>That the review only gave the product a 2/5 isn't the point of this rebuttal. Make the review about the worth of the product as I would use it, not as how I would sit it on a shelf and stare at it. I want to know how it will affect my game should I buy it. Can this be a product that is useful to me? Will it make my game a better game? What type of gaming would this be best suited for? What did you think about the utility of the stats in the back, rather than interdispersed throughout the book? Wouldn't buy the individual rings? Great! That's useful information. </p><p></p><p>And that's why I read a review in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jdanovich, post: 2012085, member: 28357"] While I appreciate every reviewer's right to his/her opinion, and I truly thank each and every one for taking the time to showcase products for the benefit of others trying to make an informed decision, I have a couple of pet peeves that continually irk me. First of all, that the basis of this review is to give weight to whether or not the price is worth the product I would comment that the number one factor should always remain content. Yes, the price could have been less. And if Fast Forward were printing tens of thousands of this book the retail price would have been amortized over a much larger print run saving thousands of dollars, and the retail could have been lower. The interior could have been color. Again, more a factor of size of print run versus cost of goods. Fast Forward would love to be able to put the extra bells and whistles into every product that large print runs afford. But until that time the production values will be more conservative. That being said, what part of those production values bring content value to the game? Having full-color interiors are visually pleasing but hardly "add" to the gaming experience, as they are not going to be seen by 90 percent of the gamers these rings would be introduced to. It would just be nice to have. No more, no less. I would be more interested in reading a review about the content rather than the packaging. But then again, I'm one of those people who could give a rat's hind end whether or not something was pretty, I care about the words. Secondly, I am always rubbed the wrong way when a large amount of effort is put into telling about typos and spelling errors. Everybody hates them, especially those that publish for a living. Everybody tries real hard to make sure that they don't happen, and they always seem to slip in, as evidenced in your review (people who live in glass houses...). 'Nuff said. That the review only gave the product a 2/5 isn't the point of this rebuttal. Make the review about the worth of the product as I would use it, not as how I would sit it on a shelf and stare at it. I want to know how it will affect my game should I buy it. Can this be a product that is useful to me? Will it make my game a better game? What type of gaming would this be best suited for? What did you think about the utility of the stats in the back, rather than interdispersed throughout the book? Wouldn't buy the individual rings? Great! That's useful information. And that's why I read a review in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rings of Power
Top