Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gvbezoff" data-source="post: 266144" data-attributes="member: 2554">Actually the text only states that BAB and Epic Attack Bonus stack for the purpose of qualifying for feats.&nbsp; No mention of qualifying for classes.&nbsp; Also, no mention of them stacking for determing the bonuses obtained from feats, so that the Improved Manyshot feat offers nothing beyond what you get for Manyshot.&nbsp; I suspect that they were being paranoid, trying to limit as much as possible the instances where BAB and Epic Attack Bonus stack, when in fact all that they really wanted and needed to exclude was them stacking for purposes of determining base number of attacks per round.The other thing I found is that the epic spell Epic Spell Reflection has a DC that is off by about 700.&nbsp; If you follow the procedure as listed in the spell description, which looks exactly right, you come up with a DC of 768, not the listed DC of 68.And, of course, I found most of the bugs other people found.&nbsp; I have to agree with those who say that the ELH was really sloppily done.&nbsp; The content, on the other hand, is mostly to my liking.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gvbezoff, post: 266144, member: 2554"] Actually the text only states that BAB and Epic Attack Bonus stack for the purpose of qualifying for feats. No mention of qualifying for classes. Also, no mention of them stacking for determing the bonuses obtained from feats, so that the Improved Manyshot feat offers nothing beyond what you get for Manyshot. I suspect that they were being paranoid, trying to limit as much as possible the instances where BAB and Epic Attack Bonus stack, when in fact all that they really wanted and needed to exclude was them stacking for purposes of determining base number of attacks per round. The other thing I found is that the epic spell Epic Spell Reflection has a DC that is off by about 700. If you follow the procedure as listed in the spell description, which looks exactly right, you come up with a DC of 768, not the listed DC of 68. And, of course, I found most of the bugs other people found. I have to agree with those who say that the ELH was really sloppily done. The content, on the other hand, is mostly to my liking. [/QUOTE]

Verification