Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 267022" data-attributes="member: 2011">I apologize. It was just a matter of you and I disagreeing so often recently combined with your opinion appearing to be blown smoke that got me in sarcasm mode.Sorry about that. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :("&nbsp; data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" />Look at the sheer number of people involved in the credits for any of the WotC products. Then look at the number for the smaller companies. Either the people at WotC are not working that hard at making the editing excellent, or they each have too many products to work on. I suspect, but cannot prove, the former.Agreed.But, I must admit that WotC puts out some of the best artwork/layouts. Too bad their writers/editors do not put in that level of effort (IMO).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 267022, member: 2011"] I apologize. It was just a matter of you and I disagreeing so often recently combined with your opinion appearing to be blown smoke that got me in sarcasm mode. Sorry about that. :( Look at the sheer number of people involved in the credits for any of the WotC products. Then look at the number for the smaller companies. Either the people at WotC are not working that hard at making the editing excellent, or they each have too many products to work on. I suspect, but cannot prove, the former. Agreed. But, I must admit that WotC puts out some of the best artwork/layouts. Too bad their writers/editors do not put in that level of effort (IMO). [/QUOTE]

Verification