Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ritual: Identify Magic Item
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4805375" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>I'm not sure what you are asking with the last question, but I can answer the first, at least from my perspective.</p><p></p><p>In (non-WotC) fantasy novels and fiction, people do not find magical items and neccessarily know what they are. They experiment, or take the item to a hermit or sage to examine, or some such.</p><p></p><p>Now, taking the item to a sage slows down the game a lot. And I understand the concept of speeding up the game.</p><p></p><p>But, auto-knowledge (note: the core rule does NOT require an Arcana check for most items) is not a good rule. It's a Monopoly rule. In other words, it's not a rule that feels right, it's a rule solely devised to speed up play. This makes it a gamist rule instead of a simulationist rule.</p><p></p><p>Now, most players are able to handwave away many of the gamist type rules in 4E. This particular rule, however, has gone from being wealth plus a day's worth of effort (too far to the left) to free (too far to the right).</p><p></p><p>Some people view it as the PCs have defeated the monster, they are ENTITLED to find magic items and auto-know what they do.</p><p></p><p>Other people view it as the PCs have defeated the monster, if there is one or more magic items there, the goal now is to determine what they do. It's a new challenge, not candy handed out for free.</p><p></p><p>Different strokes for different folks.</p><p></p><p>Handing out the info for free just feels wrong. It goes back to many entitlement discussions in our gaming community. The PCs defeat the monster, so they are entitled to treasure in the first place is also part of the 4E rules, in fact, the DMG states exactly how much treasure they should get in every encounter. There are house rules suggestions here on this board on having magic items not add bonuses and just auto-add the bonuses at certain levels because the game system is designed around the PCs having to have certain power of items at certain levels. The PCs are entitled. That bothers some DMs who want to hand out magic at their descretion and when it works for the story, not in 40% of the fights because the DMG states that the PCs need those items to stay balanced (side tracked, I know).</p><p></p><p>But IMO, the players are not entitled to auto-knowledge and even an Arcana check to figure out a magic item in 2 seconds is still too darn easy for some of us.</p><p></p><p>Hence, the reason some of us decided to add a Ritual to the game system. It gives the players a choice as to whether to continue adventuring, or spending time and some small wealth (with my house rule) to figure out what newly found items do. There can be scenario situations where stopping to figure out the item helps the party more than waiting, or vice versa. Pros and Cons, not just auto-pro of taking a short rest and Shazam, we know what all the stuff does.</p><p></p><p>The core rule makes the PCs appear to be omnipotent when it comes to magic items. That feels wrong. WotC threw the baby out with the bath water with this rule.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4805375, member: 2011"] I'm not sure what you are asking with the last question, but I can answer the first, at least from my perspective. In (non-WotC) fantasy novels and fiction, people do not find magical items and neccessarily know what they are. They experiment, or take the item to a hermit or sage to examine, or some such. Now, taking the item to a sage slows down the game a lot. And I understand the concept of speeding up the game. But, auto-knowledge (note: the core rule does NOT require an Arcana check for most items) is not a good rule. It's a Monopoly rule. In other words, it's not a rule that feels right, it's a rule solely devised to speed up play. This makes it a gamist rule instead of a simulationist rule. Now, most players are able to handwave away many of the gamist type rules in 4E. This particular rule, however, has gone from being wealth plus a day's worth of effort (too far to the left) to free (too far to the right). Some people view it as the PCs have defeated the monster, they are ENTITLED to find magic items and auto-know what they do. Other people view it as the PCs have defeated the monster, if there is one or more magic items there, the goal now is to determine what they do. It's a new challenge, not candy handed out for free. Different strokes for different folks. Handing out the info for free just feels wrong. It goes back to many entitlement discussions in our gaming community. The PCs defeat the monster, so they are entitled to treasure in the first place is also part of the 4E rules, in fact, the DMG states exactly how much treasure they should get in every encounter. There are house rules suggestions here on this board on having magic items not add bonuses and just auto-add the bonuses at certain levels because the game system is designed around the PCs having to have certain power of items at certain levels. The PCs are entitled. That bothers some DMs who want to hand out magic at their descretion and when it works for the story, not in 40% of the fights because the DMG states that the PCs need those items to stay balanced (side tracked, I know). But IMO, the players are not entitled to auto-knowledge and even an Arcana check to figure out a magic item in 2 seconds is still too darn easy for some of us. Hence, the reason some of us decided to add a Ritual to the game system. It gives the players a choice as to whether to continue adventuring, or spending time and some small wealth (with my house rule) to figure out what newly found items do. There can be scenario situations where stopping to figure out the item helps the party more than waiting, or vice versa. Pros and Cons, not just auto-pro of taking a short rest and Shazam, we know what all the stuff does. The core rule makes the PCs appear to be omnipotent when it comes to magic items. That feels wrong. WotC threw the baby out with the bath water with this rule. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ritual: Identify Magic Item
Top