Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Robillar's Gambit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="useridunavailable" data-source="post: 3659660" data-attributes="member: 53676"><p>Yeah--that's pretty well put. I had thought of it that way, and I really tend to agree, but Robilar's Gambit is good enough and easy enough to qualify for that it's become pretty ubiquitous in our group, and it kind of annoys me that it's basically a given. The example is a pretty extreme case, and it was just kind of disenchanting that the combat turned out the way it did when I didn't really intend to make an semi-invincible character. The plotline was really good and both the characters and badguys were deep and interesting, and it would have been more fun to see it go out in more heroic fashion than it did. Nobody in our party even got a turn at all...</p><p></p><p>I don't know--I guess I just think that beyond a certain point, it's kind of ridiculous for a character to get extra attacks just for being attacked. Say a 16th-level fighter uses his 4 attacks, hits 3 times, and doesn't kill a dragon. The dragon decides to attack him at +4 to hit and damage, and for his trouble, he gets his head cut the rest of the way off because the fighter gets an equal number of attacks (up to his dex modifier +1, so probably at least 5 with a pair of gloves by that level). The fighter actually has more attacks on the dragon's turn than he does on his own, and the damage isn't going to kill him. He slays the dragon in one round instead of two by virtue of the fact that the dragon decided to attack... I don't know--it just seems similar to stacking haste bonus attacks. If most monsters decide to do anything at all to you, it's basically a given that you get a bunch of extra attacks, which generally far outweighs the drawback IME.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that the Frenzied Berserker class isn't broken, I'm just saying that Robilar's Gambit is also perhaps a bit overpowered. I've seen it be ridiculously effective when used by characters across a wide array of levels and tank builds, not just this one.</p><p></p><p>*BTW--of course I know that AoOs receive the Power Attack penalty from the previous round. Because it's such a basic rule, I omitted its mention in the post above. I merely meant that the fact that easily causing foes to provoke AoOs (always at your highest AB) is a pretty good way of mitigating the drawback of using Power Attack, at least to some extent. IME, Power Attack is most detrimental when you factor in iterative attacks and their likeliness to miss because of the attack penalty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="useridunavailable, post: 3659660, member: 53676"] Yeah--that's pretty well put. I had thought of it that way, and I really tend to agree, but Robilar's Gambit is good enough and easy enough to qualify for that it's become pretty ubiquitous in our group, and it kind of annoys me that it's basically a given. The example is a pretty extreme case, and it was just kind of disenchanting that the combat turned out the way it did when I didn't really intend to make an semi-invincible character. The plotline was really good and both the characters and badguys were deep and interesting, and it would have been more fun to see it go out in more heroic fashion than it did. Nobody in our party even got a turn at all... I don't know--I guess I just think that beyond a certain point, it's kind of ridiculous for a character to get extra attacks just for being attacked. Say a 16th-level fighter uses his 4 attacks, hits 3 times, and doesn't kill a dragon. The dragon decides to attack him at +4 to hit and damage, and for his trouble, he gets his head cut the rest of the way off because the fighter gets an equal number of attacks (up to his dex modifier +1, so probably at least 5 with a pair of gloves by that level). The fighter actually has more attacks on the dragon's turn than he does on his own, and the damage isn't going to kill him. He slays the dragon in one round instead of two by virtue of the fact that the dragon decided to attack... I don't know--it just seems similar to stacking haste bonus attacks. If most monsters decide to do anything at all to you, it's basically a given that you get a bunch of extra attacks, which generally far outweighs the drawback IME. I'm not saying that the Frenzied Berserker class isn't broken, I'm just saying that Robilar's Gambit is also perhaps a bit overpowered. I've seen it be ridiculously effective when used by characters across a wide array of levels and tank builds, not just this one. *BTW--of course I know that AoOs receive the Power Attack penalty from the previous round. Because it's such a basic rule, I omitted its mention in the post above. I merely meant that the fact that easily causing foes to provoke AoOs (always at your highest AB) is a pretty good way of mitigating the drawback of using Power Attack, at least to some extent. IME, Power Attack is most detrimental when you factor in iterative attacks and their likeliness to miss because of the attack penalty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Robillar's Gambit
Top