Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Unwise" data-source="post: 8266478" data-attributes="member: 98008">Would you let somebody use &quot;Interact with Object&quot; to say that they are going to put a sword inside somebody? Surely that is easier than manacling somebody.I would say that you can use &quot;interact with object&quot; to put manacles on somebody you already have grappled. You would have to have something else to put it on though, I am not letting anybody manacle both hands together, unless they make a second grapple attack.So a rogue could grapple with their attack, grab the persons arm, then interact with an object to put manacles on the arm they are holding. The next round, they could grapple again to grab another arm or leg and manacle that too. Of course, it would be simpler to just chain them to a bannister, or pole or something.I would let them use Dex for the grapple if they were not looking to hold on, just to slap the manacles on.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Unwise, post: 8266478, member: 98008"] Would you let somebody use "Interact with Object" to say that they are going to put a sword inside somebody? Surely that is easier than manacling somebody. I would say that you can use "interact with object" to put manacles on somebody you already have grappled. You would have to have something else to put it on though, I am not letting anybody manacle both hands together, unless they make a second grapple attack. So a rogue could grapple with their attack, grab the persons arm, then interact with an object to put manacles on the arm they are holding. The next round, they could grapple again to grab another arm or leg and manacle that too. Of course, it would be simpler to just chain them to a bannister, or pole or something. I would let them use Dex for the grapple if they were not looking to hold on, just to slap the manacles on. [/QUOTE]

Verification