Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AFGNCAAP" data-source="post: 4072245" data-attributes="member: 871">As a resident Leiber fan...I'd say Mouser, class-wise, probably would be a Brawny rogue, though he does try to use his wits & quick tongue to get the Twain out of trouble when feasible.  But, despite this, he's certainly no slouch when it comes to combat.But, he's not the examplar of a brawny character, IMHO, really.  He had some strength, but his fighting style was more on grace and agility than brute force.  He tended to skewer foes with Scalpel, running them through the heart and the like, while Fafhrd chopped away at his foes.  And, since there's probably more material for the rogue class than we may have seen, there could be other builds that seem more appropriate (though inflicting deadly/painful wounds seems right up Mouser's alley).Fafhrd would probably be a Ranger, with Grey Mouser as a rogue, if single-classing is the only option.I think (if it's still viable in 4e), Fafhrd & Mouser would be multiclass characters.  Fafhrd would probably be a Ranger/Fighter (esp. for the scout/archery bit for Rangers), while Mouser would be a Rogue/Ranger/Wizard (esp. for the swashbuckler stuff/two-weapon fighting style for Rangers).  But, Mouser's use of magic was more like trying to just use the Arcana skill rather than blasting foes with magic missile or detecting magic.On a related note, Bard (when it's made) may be viable for Fafhrd if it isn't a spellcaster/spellcasting oriented class.</blockquote>

Verification