Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rogue/Barbarian sneak attack while raging?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xarlen" data-source="post: 208268" data-attributes="member: 1060"><p>Illum, don't need to use caplocks. YOu can your words to make them emphasized.</p><p></p><p>But, it appears that those who've set up in one camp aren't really going to change their mind.</p><p></p><p>But, in D&D, you can't make Called Shots because it's believed that *everyone* is trying to hit the vital areas. </p><p></p><p>However, Rogues hit even better. They know how to twist the blade and jerk it just right; something that is still doable when you're raging. Furthermore, it hurts *worse* because the Barbarian/rogue is raging. Think of the rogue stabbing his knife into someone's side, and twisting, before pulling it free. The Barbarian would punch harder, Jerk it upward, and *Yank* it out with more force, ergo the extended strenght modifer.</p><p></p><p>I don't see any Unbalancing factor about allowing a barbarian/rogue sneak attacking. What are you trying to prevent them from doing? They have to decide if they want to rage, or sneak attack, in combat, then. So it's either use One class, or use another, in classes that are combat oriented.</p><p></p><p>How can raging effect sneak attack? Let's say the two are flanking. The enemy turns to deal with the fighter, and the angry rogue slams his axe into the enemy's back, and yanks it down. Hitting someoen in the back or the neck or a limb, or other vital areas, doesn't take much concentration; it just takes the same amount of time as a regular hit. </p><p></p><p>All rogues have to do is Hit someone, when a sneak attack applies. No taking an extra amount of time to concentrate, no focusing. I have to agree with Illum since it's the Person who looses their dex bonus, that opens themselves up to get hit, not the rogue doing anything special to their attack except hitting them. The *Flavor Text* is what says rogues hit vital areas.</p><p></p><p>Edit: Furtheremore on Concentrating and taking time, let's look at the skills that are void when Raging.</p><p></p><p>Move silently. You can't Run when you're moving silently, you can only move half your movement rate. That means it takes more time then moving regularly. That takes concentration, when raging.</p><p></p><p>Casting a spell. That would generally open you up to an AoO if you did it in combat. It's leaving you open, and unguarded, focusing on the spell itself. </p><p></p><p>Craft. You have to take hours or times to work on this. Can't do this when you're pretty angry.</p><p></p><p>Intuit Direction. You're focusing on figuring where you're going, not really strong and angry tryign to hit things.</p><p></p><p>When you're sneak attacking, you're trying to <strong>hit things very effectively.</strong> When you're raging, you're trying to hit things harder. Why can't they go together?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xarlen, post: 208268, member: 1060"] Illum, don't need to use caplocks. YOu can [b] [/b] your words to make them emphasized. But, it appears that those who've set up in one camp aren't really going to change their mind. But, in D&D, you can't make Called Shots because it's believed that *everyone* is trying to hit the vital areas. However, Rogues hit even better. They know how to twist the blade and jerk it just right; something that is still doable when you're raging. Furthermore, it hurts *worse* because the Barbarian/rogue is raging. Think of the rogue stabbing his knife into someone's side, and twisting, before pulling it free. The Barbarian would punch harder, Jerk it upward, and *Yank* it out with more force, ergo the extended strenght modifer. I don't see any Unbalancing factor about allowing a barbarian/rogue sneak attacking. What are you trying to prevent them from doing? They have to decide if they want to rage, or sneak attack, in combat, then. So it's either use One class, or use another, in classes that are combat oriented. How can raging effect sneak attack? Let's say the two are flanking. The enemy turns to deal with the fighter, and the angry rogue slams his axe into the enemy's back, and yanks it down. Hitting someoen in the back or the neck or a limb, or other vital areas, doesn't take much concentration; it just takes the same amount of time as a regular hit. All rogues have to do is Hit someone, when a sneak attack applies. No taking an extra amount of time to concentrate, no focusing. I have to agree with Illum since it's the Person who looses their dex bonus, that opens themselves up to get hit, not the rogue doing anything special to their attack except hitting them. The *Flavor Text* is what says rogues hit vital areas. Edit: Furtheremore on Concentrating and taking time, let's look at the skills that are void when Raging. Move silently. You can't Run when you're moving silently, you can only move half your movement rate. That means it takes more time then moving regularly. That takes concentration, when raging. Casting a spell. That would generally open you up to an AoO if you did it in combat. It's leaving you open, and unguarded, focusing on the spell itself. Craft. You have to take hours or times to work on this. Can't do this when you're pretty angry. Intuit Direction. You're focusing on figuring where you're going, not really strong and angry tryign to hit things. When you're sneak attacking, you're trying to [b]hit things very effectively.[/b] When you're raging, you're trying to hit things harder. Why can't they go together? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rogue/Barbarian sneak attack while raging?
Top