Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 457707" data-attributes="member: 5890">The ability is called quicker than the eye, and is much better than just bluffing in combat.It's a bluff check opposed by a spot check as a move-equivalent action, and if you win, the target looks away (and loses his dex bonus) as you take your partial action. Hence you can use it for hiding, palming objects and also stabbing people.cogitens - the only applications for sense motive which take a minute are those which are aimed at determining the trustworthiness of someone, or discovering whether they are affected by an enchantment of some kind. Note that opposing a bluff is mentioned under bluff, not sense motive, and a bluff ALWAYS goes against a sense motive. I cannot honestly see rage stopping this.Nor can I see rage destroying the ability to feint in combat. It's fairly obvious that the only combat options really denied to a raging individual are those which are defensive in nature, something that feinting certainly is not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 457707, member: 5890"] The ability is called quicker than the eye, and is much better than just bluffing in combat. It's a bluff check opposed by a spot check as a move-equivalent action, and if you win, the target looks away (and loses his dex bonus) as you take your partial action. Hence you can use it for hiding, palming objects and also stabbing people. cogitens - the only applications for sense motive which take a minute are those which are aimed at determining the trustworthiness of someone, or discovering whether they are affected by an enchantment of some kind. Note that opposing a bluff is mentioned under bluff, not sense motive, and a bluff ALWAYS goes against a sense motive. I cannot honestly see rage stopping this. Nor can I see rage destroying the ability to feint in combat. It's fairly obvious that the only combat options really denied to a raging individual are those which are defensive in nature, something that feinting certainly is not. [/QUOTE]

Verification