Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CovertOps" data-source="post: 5345692" data-attributes="member: 65152">It's largely a moot point, but you're wrong about this reading.  It does not require you to have combat advantage when you hit.  The "and" clearly makes the requirements separate and individual.  Neither requirement has anything to do with the other.  Did you hit?  Do you have CA?  I'd almost bet this is the reason for the errata.The errata'd version on the other hand is quite clear:"...and hit an enemy granting combat advantage to you..."Under the new wording I'm not clear if the order even makes any difference whatsoever.  At least I can't think of any cases where it does.Attack: blah vs blahEffect: knock proneHit: damageAttack: blah vs blahHit: damageEffect: knock prone</blockquote>