Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9447060" data-attributes="member: 7030563">Well my DM in 2 of the 3 games I am a player in will probably ask me how it should be, in the 3rd game the DM will let me do whatever I want, in the 4th game I am playing I am the DM.Is it fair?&nbsp; Well true-strike AB is less damage than EB/AB at most levels, less damage than a POB Warlock with extra attack invocations and less damage than most extra-attack options from other classes at most levels.&nbsp; The only thing it is objectively better than is when multiclassed with Rogue and comparing to a single class Rogue making a sneak attack from range.&nbsp; In that respect I think it is as fair as allowing Paladins, Wizards and Warlocks to play at the same table with Rogues when the former can do substantially more damage.This use of the rules does not level the playing field in terms of damage and is not much of an advantage for anything other than a ranged Rogue. With a 20 casting stat and a 2-level Warlock dip, depending on level, you are talking about 1-12 damage more than a single class Rogue would do on a ranged sneak attack&nbsp; .... and less damage at most levels than a melee/dual wielding single-classed Rogue would do.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9447060, member: 7030563"] Well my DM in 2 of the 3 games I am a player in will probably ask me how it should be, in the 3rd game the DM will let me do whatever I want, in the 4th game I am playing I am the DM. Is it fair? Well true-strike AB is less damage than EB/AB at most levels, less damage than a POB Warlock with extra attack invocations and less damage than most extra-attack options from other classes at most levels. The only thing it is objectively better than is when multiclassed with Rogue and comparing to a single class Rogue making a sneak attack from range. In that respect I think it is as fair as allowing Paladins, Wizards and Warlocks to play at the same table with Rogues when the former can do substantially more damage. This use of the rules does not level the playing field in terms of damage and is not much of an advantage for anything other than a ranged Rogue. With a 20 casting stat and a 2-level Warlock dip, depending on level, you are talking about 1-12 damage more than a single class Rogue would do on a ranged sneak attack .... and less damage at most levels than a melee/dual wielding single-classed Rogue would do. [/QUOTE]

Verification