Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rogue's Cunning Action to Hide: In Combat??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8375175" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>Rogues (and other classes) <em>are</em> balanced around how they feel. That’s why rogues perform about on par with fighters in terms of at-will damage despite the fact that they “should” do better at-will damage to compensate for their total lack of ability to nova. That’s the level damage output that was found to feel right for the majority of players during playtesting.</p><p></p><p>If the rogue feels fine to you and your play group with only one attack per turn, nothing is wrong with that. But it is below the point that playtesting found most players felt was right, which means most players would probably think they felt too weak in your games. Of course, most players don’t play in your games, only the players who play in your games do. And if those players think rogues feel fine, there’s no problem. However, it does seem to be a problem for a lot of groups that the DM rules on stealth in a way that at least some of the players find makes rogues feel too weak (especially if those players are mathematically inclined and are familiar with the mathematical assumptions underlying the rogue’s design.) If that’s not your group, great! No problem. But it is many groups, including seemingly [USER=6702445]@jayoungr[/USER] ’s.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8375175, member: 6779196"] Rogues (and other classes) [I]are[/I] balanced around how they feel. That’s why rogues perform about on par with fighters in terms of at-will damage despite the fact that they “should” do better at-will damage to compensate for their total lack of ability to nova. That’s the level damage output that was found to feel right for the majority of players during playtesting. If the rogue feels fine to you and your play group with only one attack per turn, nothing is wrong with that. But it is below the point that playtesting found most players felt was right, which means most players would probably think they felt too weak in your games. Of course, most players don’t play in your games, only the players who play in your games do. And if those players think rogues feel fine, there’s no problem. However, it does seem to be a problem for a lot of groups that the DM rules on stealth in a way that at least some of the players find makes rogues feel too weak (especially if those players are mathematically inclined and are familiar with the mathematical assumptions underlying the rogue’s design.) If that’s not your group, great! No problem. But it is many groups, including seemingly [USER=6702445]@jayoungr[/USER] ’s. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rogue's Cunning Action to Hide: In Combat??
Top