Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Role/Roll Playing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Water Bob" data-source="post: 5577291" data-attributes="member: 92305"><p>Some people tend to equate playing suboptimal (mechanically) characters with roleplaying. I think, as I said up thread, that a good roleplayer plays a character no matter the outcome of the stats. A good roleplayer can take a monster of a character and make him a memorable personality and with equal skill, take a weak (stat-wise) character and make him just as memorable.</p><p> </p><p>The test I mention is a good one, I think, because most players, good roleplayers or not, have no problem playing a monster-stat super-hero character. More players, though, have trouble with, or flat-out refuse to play a character that they don't consider a "hero".</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I don't think optimization is a bad thing at all. Why not take what you got and make the best of it? Got a monster-stat character? Good for you. Kick some butt!</p><p> </p><p>Got a poor, weak, character? OK, then, do something with it. Treat it as a challenge and make him an interesting character in spite of his stat-deficiencies.</p><p> </p><p>The threat is about rollplaying vs. roleplaying. Great roleplayers play characters, regardless of "good" or "bad" stats. Rollplayers play stats.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I don't. Although I do think the line is blurry, and the distinction is rather gray than black & white. I've known players who are great roleplayers as long as they have characters that they consider to be superior stat-wise. Yes, these people fail my test because I don't consider them overall great roleplayers--their great play is conditional.</p><p> </p><p>To me, a great roleplayer is someone who can take a stick and make it the most memorable forest you've ever seen.</p><p> </p><p>There's a player that will be upset that his mage has a low CON score, citing that mages already have the smallest hit die and mages need every hit point that they can get. Then, there's the player who will look at that low CON score, accept it, embrace it, and turn his mage into the scratchy voiced, health-problemed, Raistlin Majere.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Water Bob, post: 5577291, member: 92305"] Some people tend to equate playing suboptimal (mechanically) characters with roleplaying. I think, as I said up thread, that a good roleplayer plays a character no matter the outcome of the stats. A good roleplayer can take a monster of a character and make him a memorable personality and with equal skill, take a weak (stat-wise) character and make him just as memorable. The test I mention is a good one, I think, because most players, good roleplayers or not, have no problem playing a monster-stat super-hero character. More players, though, have trouble with, or flat-out refuse to play a character that they don't consider a "hero". I don't think optimization is a bad thing at all. Why not take what you got and make the best of it? Got a monster-stat character? Good for you. Kick some butt! Got a poor, weak, character? OK, then, do something with it. Treat it as a challenge and make him an interesting character in spite of his stat-deficiencies. The threat is about rollplaying vs. roleplaying. Great roleplayers play characters, regardless of "good" or "bad" stats. Rollplayers play stats. I don't. Although I do think the line is blurry, and the distinction is rather gray than black & white. I've known players who are great roleplayers as long as they have characters that they consider to be superior stat-wise. Yes, these people fail my test because I don't consider them overall great roleplayers--their great play is conditional. To me, a great roleplayer is someone who can take a stick and make it the most memorable forest you've ever seen. There's a player that will be upset that his mage has a low CON score, citing that mages already have the smallest hit die and mages need every hit point that they can get. Then, there's the player who will look at that low CON score, accept it, embrace it, and turn his mage into the scratchy voiced, health-problemed, Raistlin Majere. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Role/Roll Playing
Top