Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Role-roll, roll-role, just role, just roll, please read the poll.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stormonu" data-source="post: 5735667" data-attributes="member: 52734"><p>I <em>want</em> those who have a high Charisma score and who have invested points into skills such as Diplomacy to have some meaning, but I'm conflicted on how to do it.</p><p></p><p>Just as I don't think that someone who has low Strength in real life should be forced to always play-low Strength characters, I think everyone should have the option to play a high Charisma character if they want and not have their options limited by their own social skill limitations.</p><p></p><p>At the same time, I don't want a single die roll to dominate every social situation or to have utter improbable results because someone pulls out a silver-tongued speech with their 8 Cha character.</p><p></p><p>In combat, you have to at least tell the DM <em>what</em> you're going to attempt and give a basic idea how you're going to do it ("I'm going to bash the goblin with my long sword!"), and it should be somewhat similar in social situations. </p><p></p><p>Likewise, it shouldn't fall to one character to make all the rolls; that's as bad as relying on one character to do <em>all</em> the fighting. Ideally, a high Charisma/Diplomacy character should be able to convince someone quicker and more reliably, but lesser characters should have a <em>chance</em> to succeed, though they may have to struggle harder to do so. And they should feel welcome to try their hand at negotiation and such, just like everyone is pretty much coaxed to <em>do something <strong>helpful</strong></em> during a fight.</p><p></p><p>Where you want dramatic tension, I suspect you'd want multiple checks or an extended encounter. For example, the corrupt baron shouldn't be convince to acquiesce his kingdom any more easily than the party has a chance of killing the ancient red dragon in one blow. </p><p></p><p>Some situations where there is a chance of failure but it's not dramatically important - getting the barmaid to sit and drink with you during downtime, for ex. - might be best handled like encountering a minion; a single check will solve the matter.</p><p></p><p>The big problem is coming up with a system that dramatically allows characters to influence social situations without either pure RP or dice-rolling to dominate. </p><p></p><p>Skill challenges were a nice start in the right direction, but they are too formulaic; they should feel as organic as combat in that you know where the starting point is and you have option to achieve success, but it should be open enough to let PC's move toward how they want to achieve victory (and that there are many different forms of victory or defeat).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stormonu, post: 5735667, member: 52734"] I [I]want[/I] those who have a high Charisma score and who have invested points into skills such as Diplomacy to have some meaning, but I'm conflicted on how to do it. Just as I don't think that someone who has low Strength in real life should be forced to always play-low Strength characters, I think everyone should have the option to play a high Charisma character if they want and not have their options limited by their own social skill limitations. At the same time, I don't want a single die roll to dominate every social situation or to have utter improbable results because someone pulls out a silver-tongued speech with their 8 Cha character. In combat, you have to at least tell the DM [I]what[/I] you're going to attempt and give a basic idea how you're going to do it ("I'm going to bash the goblin with my long sword!"), and it should be somewhat similar in social situations. Likewise, it shouldn't fall to one character to make all the rolls; that's as bad as relying on one character to do [I]all[/I] the fighting. Ideally, a high Charisma/Diplomacy character should be able to convince someone quicker and more reliably, but lesser characters should have a [I]chance[/I] to succeed, though they may have to struggle harder to do so. And they should feel welcome to try their hand at negotiation and such, just like everyone is pretty much coaxed to [I]do something [B]helpful[/B][/I] during a fight. Where you want dramatic tension, I suspect you'd want multiple checks or an extended encounter. For example, the corrupt baron shouldn't be convince to acquiesce his kingdom any more easily than the party has a chance of killing the ancient red dragon in one blow. Some situations where there is a chance of failure but it's not dramatically important - getting the barmaid to sit and drink with you during downtime, for ex. - might be best handled like encountering a minion; a single check will solve the matter. The big problem is coming up with a system that dramatically allows characters to influence social situations without either pure RP or dice-rolling to dominate. Skill challenges were a nice start in the right direction, but they are too formulaic; they should feel as organic as combat in that you know where the starting point is and you have option to achieve success, but it should be open enough to let PC's move toward how they want to achieve victory (and that there are many different forms of victory or defeat). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Role-roll, roll-role, just role, just roll, please read the poll.
Top