NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 8506410" data-attributes="member: 71699">[USER=16814]@Ovinomancer[/USER] our last multiple exchanges have not helped advance understanding one iota. You seem determined that my adjudication and narration must be wrong somehow. I am determined in defending that they were right. I do not believe we will satisfactorily resolve that.To be clear, on RAW and on narrating meaningful consequences - ones that matter - I am confident of my adjudication and it seems impossible to imagine anything you will say - based on what you have said - that will change that.Equally, I will do you the cordiality of assuming you are confident I am in the wrong, and nothing I say - based on what I have said - will change that.If ever there was a time to agree to disagree, now is it. I know it can be odious to put in the last word and end the conversation. So I will say here that I won't be replying further on this line of discussion.[POSTSCRIPT I realise I did learn something to carry forward. When we're not privy to the prior conversation, and don't know the thought processes of a DM, we can't tell if 5e* is being played. That is something you said up-thread about video of DW. At the time I thought you mistaken, but you were right. From my perspective, that is what has played out before me here. Any written "proof" of playing 5e* must meet a high bar: prior conversation, the shared fiction in play, any DM thought processes must all be richly articulated. One will need to speak for imagined players, as well as DM.]</blockquote>

Verification