Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AngeltheTechrat" data-source="post: 4662219" data-attributes="member: 82200"><img src="http://thundershot.net/thex/images/smiles/tumbleweed.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /> ........&nbsp; ........................ wut? <img src="http://thundershot.net/thex/images/smiles/embarassed.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;He's not a jerk by any means. That's.... an awful lot of ad-hock to even concider, though. It makes the whole thing feel sour.. Like I wrote it myself instead of assembling it from all the pieces. I mean sure.. I can see house rules when there is something it makes smoother for everyone who's playing, but I've never belived one person has a right to ask such things. Especialy people like me. It's already starting to seem like too much to ask what I'm asking when/if a suitable race presents itself for a ranger concept I'm working on. No, I'm not going to ask to rebuild an existing character, especialy on ad-hock rules. &nbsp;&nbsp;Besides.. For one thing, cantrips don't address the whole bookish flavor, and for another, there isn't exactly an arcane power set that one can switch them over to that has the right feel anyway. Warlock has striker stuff, but it's all tied up in pacts and curses and whatnot. &nbsp;&nbsp;No, my argument is that it would have been easier to build characters one wants if they were to have given power options that covered more than one role for each class. So there's nothing left but to lament.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AngeltheTechrat, post: 4662219, member: 82200"] [URL="javascript:emoticon('::TUMBLEWEED::')"][IMG]http://thundershot.net/thex/images/smiles/tumbleweed.gif[/IMG][/URL] ........ ........................ wut? [URL="javascript:emoticon(':oops:')"][IMG]http://thundershot.net/thex/images/smiles/embarassed.gif[/IMG][/URL] He's not a jerk by any means. That's.... an awful lot of ad-hock to even concider, though. It makes the whole thing feel sour.. Like I wrote it myself instead of assembling it from all the pieces. I mean sure.. I can see house rules when there is something it makes smoother for [B]everyone[/B] who's playing, but I've never belived one person has a right to ask such things. Especialy people like me. It's already starting to seem like too much to ask what I'm asking when/if a suitable race presents itself for a ranger concept I'm working on. No, I'm not going to ask to rebuild an existing character, especialy on ad-hock rules. Besides.. For one thing, cantrips don't address the whole bookish flavor, and for another, there isn't exactly an arcane power set that one can switch them over to that has the right feel anyway. Warlock has striker stuff, but it's all tied up in pacts and curses and whatnot. No, my argument is that it [B]would[/B] have been easier to build characters one wants [B]if[/B] they were to have given power options that covered more than one role for each class. So there's nothing left but to lament. [/QUOTE]

Verification