Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 5740210" data-attributes="member: 48965">[MENTION=4892]Vyvyan Basterd[/MENTION]: I may be reading your posts incorrectly but you seem to be arguing from a disingenuous position.   On the one hand you tell me that you can reskin a barbarian to be a city-born, noble-bred scion who channels the power of dragons.  Now, not once did you mention that this noble-born, city dweller concept was actually a city-dweller who spent all his time in the wilds and a noble that never learned anything at court... somehow, auto-magically I was suppose to realize that we were really discussing the anti-concept of what you presented.  If this isn't a "GOTCHA" type situation I don't know what is.  You were purposefully misleading in naming your concept.    Then you proceed to try and place blame on me for taking the concept you presented at face value (assuming) and infer that it is only my preconceived and limited idea of the concept you presented that's really at fault... when in actuality the concept, as you presented it, was misleading and not really the concept you ended up constructing... you know like the fighter whose been re-skinned as a wizard... only with no spells and no magic and no lore... At this point I'm going to say, I didn't realize my concept. In other words... wait a minute I'll claim one concept then create a concept that's different (while claiming it's the same) and kind of weasel it in there somehow, disregard the actual rules, tropes and mechanical weight the concept I actually put forth would be expected by most to have and declare it successful. To me this smacks of dishonest discussion, plain and simple.</blockquote>

Verification