Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Roll for Combat got to try the 3D vtt and he seems to like it. Live streaming now.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EpicureanDM" data-source="post: 9210879" data-attributes="member: 6996003"><p>Just because they're selling more doesn't mean they aren't losing money. And I disagree that they're selling more.</p><p></p><p>This is an opportunistic marriage of convenience between the D&DB team - who operate largely independent of the D&D books team - and RFC. The acquisition of D&DB blew a $140m-ish hole in the D&D segment's balance sheet. (Maybe it's on WotC's? Hard to say, but if I were the M:tG executives, I'd fight that tooth and nail.) D&DB isn't getting enough revenue from the D&D book team's products, so they're pulling out all the stops to get some sort of revenue from other sources, i.e. third-party licensing. </p><p></p><p>RFC's just looking for more digital sales and D&DB's a huge potential market for them. There's so much gullibility for them to take advantage of. On the one hand, there's <em>someone</em> at WotC who thinks that RFC will give them some sort of positive PR bump for the new VTT stuff. Anyone who looks at RFC's usual WotC content should be under no illusions about the disdain and cynicism with which RFC views the management of WotC. And yet some WotC/D&D team leaders have given RFC an exclusive glimpse into the VTT that will generate views on YouTube. This goes beyond the idea that the D&D team's trying to win over their worst critics into something more sad.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, look at the benefit of the doubt being extended in this thread. How could anyone familiar with RFC's content not be skeptical, cynical, and suspicious of this new RFC video? RFC's whole shtick centers around their belief that WotC's executives and leaders are terrible at their jobs and actively hostile to the game's design and financial future. But when offered an exclusive peek at the current state of the VTT by those same executives and leaders, RFC jumps. Why should we extend any credibility to whatever RFC's going to say about the VTT? It's pure clout-chasing by these guys. Despite the fact that 99% of their content takes a massive dump on WotC, RFC were invited to share their impressions of the VTT with their audience of people who presumably also believe that WotC's stewardship of D&D is a disaster. WotC's most ardent defenders can be found in this thread and they're leaping to defend a group of YouTubers who never miss an opportunity to paint WotC and the D&D team in the most unflattering light. It's a staggering display of the clout wielded by RFC and how gullible some of WotC's fans are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EpicureanDM, post: 9210879, member: 6996003"] Just because they're selling more doesn't mean they aren't losing money. And I disagree that they're selling more. This is an opportunistic marriage of convenience between the D&DB team - who operate largely independent of the D&D books team - and RFC. The acquisition of D&DB blew a $140m-ish hole in the D&D segment's balance sheet. (Maybe it's on WotC's? Hard to say, but if I were the M:tG executives, I'd fight that tooth and nail.) D&DB isn't getting enough revenue from the D&D book team's products, so they're pulling out all the stops to get some sort of revenue from other sources, i.e. third-party licensing. RFC's just looking for more digital sales and D&DB's a huge potential market for them. There's so much gullibility for them to take advantage of. On the one hand, there's [I]someone[/I] at WotC who thinks that RFC will give them some sort of positive PR bump for the new VTT stuff. Anyone who looks at RFC's usual WotC content should be under no illusions about the disdain and cynicism with which RFC views the management of WotC. And yet some WotC/D&D team leaders have given RFC an exclusive glimpse into the VTT that will generate views on YouTube. This goes beyond the idea that the D&D team's trying to win over their worst critics into something more sad. On the other hand, look at the benefit of the doubt being extended in this thread. How could anyone familiar with RFC's content not be skeptical, cynical, and suspicious of this new RFC video? RFC's whole shtick centers around their belief that WotC's executives and leaders are terrible at their jobs and actively hostile to the game's design and financial future. But when offered an exclusive peek at the current state of the VTT by those same executives and leaders, RFC jumps. Why should we extend any credibility to whatever RFC's going to say about the VTT? It's pure clout-chasing by these guys. Despite the fact that 99% of their content takes a massive dump on WotC, RFC were invited to share their impressions of the VTT with their audience of people who presumably also believe that WotC's stewardship of D&D is a disaster. WotC's most ardent defenders can be found in this thread and they're leaping to defend a group of YouTubers who never miss an opportunity to paint WotC and the D&D team in the most unflattering light. It's a staggering display of the clout wielded by RFC and how gullible some of WotC's fans are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Roll for Combat got to try the 3D vtt and he seems to like it. Live streaming now.
Top