Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Roll for Effect or Intent?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BenjaminPey" data-source="post: 9751412" data-attributes="member: 7039344"><p>I vote "for intent", though I'm more familiar with the "conflict resolution" naming.</p><p>I've nothing against task-resolution, it suits some gameplays, especially in the OSR and FKR spheres, where the main point is very often to choose the (or a, rather) good action, in order to achieve the desired intent.</p><p>But I'm very much fond of conflict-resolution in general, for the speed and snapinness (is that a word?) it confers.</p><p></p><p>I just wanted to add something that I found to be interesting in this conversation, regarding D&D 5E, a game I very much enjoy, among many others. It's mostly task-oriented in my opinion, but it <em>can</em> be played with conflict resolution to some degree, as a poster (I think it was [USER=6779196]@Charlaquin[/USER]) exemplified by saying that, in order to distract a guard by throwing a rock on a tree, you could ask for a Dex (deception) check. </p><p></p><p>See, the Dex part is rather task-oriented: by choosing Dex, we're saying that what will be tested is the throwing part, the one requiring dexterity. But by adding that it will be a Dex (<em>Deception</em>) check, the test becomes: did we throw this rock in such a way that it will achieve our intent (which is: deception)? And that's when it becomes a conflict resolution.</p><p></p><p>I'll add that the other way to do this (it was added later), still conflict-oriented, is to directly test the guard reaction, by making them making a saving throw. This way, we make sure we focus on the intent (distracting the guard), not on the task (throwing a rock).</p><p></p><p>Wa can maybe deplore the game is more or less mute on this question and don't clarify all this at all, but I <em>think</em> (much emphasis on that) it's really a feature, not a bug, to put the game in this kind of liminal space between old and new school and allow the tables to choose and even to go back and forth between the two, depending on the situations, the scope, the flow. It suits me very well, in any case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BenjaminPey, post: 9751412, member: 7039344"] I vote "for intent", though I'm more familiar with the "conflict resolution" naming. I've nothing against task-resolution, it suits some gameplays, especially in the OSR and FKR spheres, where the main point is very often to choose the (or a, rather) good action, in order to achieve the desired intent. But I'm very much fond of conflict-resolution in general, for the speed and snapinness (is that a word?) it confers. I just wanted to add something that I found to be interesting in this conversation, regarding D&D 5E, a game I very much enjoy, among many others. It's mostly task-oriented in my opinion, but it [I]can[/I] be played with conflict resolution to some degree, as a poster (I think it was [USER=6779196]@Charlaquin[/USER]) exemplified by saying that, in order to distract a guard by throwing a rock on a tree, you could ask for a Dex (deception) check. See, the Dex part is rather task-oriented: by choosing Dex, we're saying that what will be tested is the throwing part, the one requiring dexterity. But by adding that it will be a Dex ([I]Deception[/I]) check, the test becomes: did we throw this rock in such a way that it will achieve our intent (which is: deception)? And that's when it becomes a conflict resolution. I'll add that the other way to do this (it was added later), still conflict-oriented, is to directly test the guard reaction, by making them making a saving throw. This way, we make sure we focus on the intent (distracting the guard), not on the task (throwing a rock). Wa can maybe deplore the game is more or less mute on this question and don't clarify all this at all, but I [I]think[/I] (much emphasis on that) it's really a feature, not a bug, to put the game in this kind of liminal space between old and new school and allow the tables to choose and even to go back and forth between the two, depending on the situations, the scope, the flow. It suits me very well, in any case. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Roll for Effect or Intent?
Top