Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Roll it back just one second!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 7356226" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>Personally, I’d just roll with both attacks hitting the Ogre, and I wouldn’t make a big deal of narrating him Ready being dead by the time the second attack hits. It was the player’s choice to roll both attacks at once rather than waiting to see if the first attack hit. I can see why others might just tell the player that he dies after the first hit and give him the second attack back, but personally I’d rather just narrate the results and move on.</p><p></p><p></p><p>”Ok, Bob, if you want to use that d4 you can roll it now and add it to your 15, or use it on a later roll if you like.”</p><p></p><p>Reasoning: this one is my fault for not offering the other players the opportunity to buff Bob’s character before asking for Bob’s roll. I’m not going to deprive Bob of a +1d4 because I was in too much of a hurry.</p><p></p><p></p><p>”Please just tell me what your character is doing, I’ll determine how best to resolve the action. I’m hearing that you want to confuse the guard by double-talking him?”</p><p>(assuming the Tom responds in the affirmative)</p><p>“Ok, please make a Charisma check with disadvantage. Add your Proficiency bonus if you’re trained in Deception.”</p><p></p><p>Reasoning: Tom’s role is to describe his character’s actions, not to choose which mechanics to use to resolve those actions. It’s not his decision whether or not his double-speak would give Bob Advantage. In fact, based on his description, it sounds like he and Bob have different goals and approaches, so I don’t feel giving Bob Advantage would be an appropriate way to resolve Tom’s action. Tom should make a roll of his own to see if his approach succeeds in achieving his goal, and it should have Disadvantage because the conflicting stories from Bob and Tom are going to set the guard on edge.</p><p></p><p>Now, assuming I had determined that Advantage to Bob’s roll was an appropriate way to resolve Tom’s action, I would have instead said, “Ok Bob, go ahead and make that second roll since I didn’t give Tom the opportunity to say that before you rolled. Tom, please remember just to describe your action, I’ll tell you what you need to roll to resolve it.”</p><p></p><p>Reasoning: this one is my fault again. I should have asked the other players if they wanted to say anything first before asking for Bob’s roll. I would want to verbally acknowledge my mistake, and also gently remind Tom to let me determine how to resolve actions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 7356226, member: 6779196"] Personally, I’d just roll with both attacks hitting the Ogre, and I wouldn’t make a big deal of narrating him Ready being dead by the time the second attack hits. It was the player’s choice to roll both attacks at once rather than waiting to see if the first attack hit. I can see why others might just tell the player that he dies after the first hit and give him the second attack back, but personally I’d rather just narrate the results and move on. ”Ok, Bob, if you want to use that d4 you can roll it now and add it to your 15, or use it on a later roll if you like.” Reasoning: this one is my fault for not offering the other players the opportunity to buff Bob’s character before asking for Bob’s roll. I’m not going to deprive Bob of a +1d4 because I was in too much of a hurry. ”Please just tell me what your character is doing, I’ll determine how best to resolve the action. I’m hearing that you want to confuse the guard by double-talking him?” (assuming the Tom responds in the affirmative) “Ok, please make a Charisma check with disadvantage. Add your Proficiency bonus if you’re trained in Deception.” Reasoning: Tom’s role is to describe his character’s actions, not to choose which mechanics to use to resolve those actions. It’s not his decision whether or not his double-speak would give Bob Advantage. In fact, based on his description, it sounds like he and Bob have different goals and approaches, so I don’t feel giving Bob Advantage would be an appropriate way to resolve Tom’s action. Tom should make a roll of his own to see if his approach succeeds in achieving his goal, and it should have Disadvantage because the conflicting stories from Bob and Tom are going to set the guard on edge. Now, assuming I had determined that Advantage to Bob’s roll was an appropriate way to resolve Tom’s action, I would have instead said, “Ok Bob, go ahead and make that second roll since I didn’t give Tom the opportunity to say that before you rolled. Tom, please remember just to describe your action, I’ll tell you what you need to roll to resolve it.” Reasoning: this one is my fault again. I should have asked the other players if they wanted to say anything first before asking for Bob’s roll. I would want to verbally acknowledge my mistake, and also gently remind Tom to let me determine how to resolve actions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Roll it back just one second!
Top