Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 6340217" data-attributes="member: 22424">That was almost (but not quite) the rule in 4e - there, a nat-20 was a crit unless the 20 by itself wouldn't have been enough to hit.(That is, if you were attacking AC 26 with a +6 bonus then a nat-20 would hit and crit; if you were attacking AC 27 then a nat-20 would just be a hit.)Personally, though, I think they're wise to ditch that bit, as it was just a nuisance. The benefit of being able to jump straight to the crit outweighs the drawback, IMO. YMMV, of course. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>