Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arikabeth" data-source="post: 7124045" data-attributes="member: 6872826">One of the arguments against it is that it'd take too much more time to reroll everything every turn. There are already enough things to keep track of in combat in 4E in my experience, especially in paragon and epic levels. It'd mean that some effects which have durations like &quot;until the end of your next turn&quot; could either last longer or shorter, which I assume would just up the RNG aspect of combat.&nbsp;The turns would be could be trickier to plan out and battles could probably get more swingy depending on who ends up when in initiative, but as Yunru said characters can still delay to take actions in the order they prefer (though they'd likely be more prone to missing out on buffs and such).I imagine that initiative would be even more valuable if inititative was rolled every round, and thus a shift builds more towards getting initiative boosts... but that's just an uneducated guess.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arikabeth, post: 7124045, member: 6872826"] One of the arguments against it is that it'd take too much more time to reroll everything every turn. There are already enough things to keep track of in combat in 4E in my experience, especially in paragon and epic levels. It'd mean that some effects which have durations like "until the end of your next turn" could either last longer or shorter, which I assume would just up the RNG aspect of combat. The turns would be could be trickier to plan out and battles could probably get more swingy depending on who ends up when in initiative, but as Yunru said characters can still delay to take actions in the order they prefer (though they'd likely be more prone to missing out on buffs and such). I imagine that initiative would be even more valuable if inititative was rolled every round, and thus a shift builds more towards getting initiative boosts... but that's just an uneducated guess. [/QUOTE]

Verification