Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rolling Without a Chance of Failure (I love it)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iserith" data-source="post: 8442403" data-attributes="member: 97077"><p>That fails to honor the action declaration in my view. The player said the character touched the chest since that is assumed in the action declaration of "I examine the chest for traps." Now the DM is saying they didn't touch it. No bueno in my view. DM can't say what the character does.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The example shows orders of specificity for failure and for uncertainty. There's one more, too: automatic success. If the character specifically searches beneath the folded clothes in the top drawer, there is no need for an ability check since the outcome is certain - they find the key, no roll. The example indicates that reasonable specificity is required and demonstrate that how a player describes an action has an impact on whether it's a success, a failure, or whether a roll is called for.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, first, the goal of the player isn't to roll. It's to find the trap. Rolling is bad. Succeeding outright by removing uncertainty or the meaningful consequence for failure is the best strategy given how the game is designed.</p><p></p><p>Second, my traps are telegraphed. In this case (since I've used this trap before in a one-shot), I described it as "an oversized chest (50 lbs.) of exotic hardwood banded with iron is sealed shut by an oddly-shaped lock with an intricate design." Some players honed in on the lock and searched it specifically for a trap, some using light sources or the like to illuminate the keyhole to see the mechanisms inside. Nobody touched it. (I ran this for about half a dozen groups.) Depending on the approach, this was resolved with a Wisdom (Perception) or Intelligence (Investigation) check.</p><p></p><p>At least a couple of groups just smashed the chest open because they didn't have anyone that could disarm the trap or pick the lock. This meant breaking a stone tablet within that contained a unique and hilarious spell: <em>ray of nudity</em>. Another group as I recall disabled the trap, extracted the poisoned needle and then used that poison on a villain in the adventure location to great effect. Another group found the key to the chest in another chamber and just used it to unlock the chest. One group used acid to destroy the lock and the trap. What was in the chest was more than the cost of the acid so that was a good trade.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I try to avoid saying anything about the character and describe only the result of their actions. There are a lot of DMs who are happy to hear a lackluster action declaration from a player and then fill in the blanks, assuming and establishing what the character is doing. And there are plenty of players that are happy to play that way. Not at my table!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iserith, post: 8442403, member: 97077"] That fails to honor the action declaration in my view. The player said the character touched the chest since that is assumed in the action declaration of "I examine the chest for traps." Now the DM is saying they didn't touch it. No bueno in my view. DM can't say what the character does. The example shows orders of specificity for failure and for uncertainty. There's one more, too: automatic success. If the character specifically searches beneath the folded clothes in the top drawer, there is no need for an ability check since the outcome is certain - they find the key, no roll. The example indicates that reasonable specificity is required and demonstrate that how a player describes an action has an impact on whether it's a success, a failure, or whether a roll is called for. Well, first, the goal of the player isn't to roll. It's to find the trap. Rolling is bad. Succeeding outright by removing uncertainty or the meaningful consequence for failure is the best strategy given how the game is designed. Second, my traps are telegraphed. In this case (since I've used this trap before in a one-shot), I described it as "an oversized chest (50 lbs.) of exotic hardwood banded with iron is sealed shut by an oddly-shaped lock with an intricate design." Some players honed in on the lock and searched it specifically for a trap, some using light sources or the like to illuminate the keyhole to see the mechanisms inside. Nobody touched it. (I ran this for about half a dozen groups.) Depending on the approach, this was resolved with a Wisdom (Perception) or Intelligence (Investigation) check. At least a couple of groups just smashed the chest open because they didn't have anyone that could disarm the trap or pick the lock. This meant breaking a stone tablet within that contained a unique and hilarious spell: [I]ray of nudity[/I]. Another group as I recall disabled the trap, extracted the poisoned needle and then used that poison on a villain in the adventure location to great effect. Another group found the key to the chest in another chamber and just used it to unlock the chest. One group used acid to destroy the lock and the trap. What was in the chest was more than the cost of the acid so that was a good trade. I try to avoid saying anything about the character and describe only the result of their actions. There are a lot of DMs who are happy to hear a lackluster action declaration from a player and then fill in the blanks, assuming and establishing what the character is doing. And there are plenty of players that are happy to play that way. Not at my table! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rolling Without a Chance of Failure (I love it)
Top