Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8443641" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>Yeah, that would absolutely be a valid approach to take. As a very general approach it would be very unlikely to eliminate the possibility of failure, but by the same token it will pretty much always have a chance of success as long as there’s something to be found. So this might be a good way to go if you can’t think of anything that you think would eliminate the chance of failure but you still want to try and rely on your stats to get you there. Though it would also take time to do thoroughly, which would mean moving closer to the next check for random encounters, whereas a more specific approach might be able to be done faster.</p></blockquote><p></p>