Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Roman "knights" ?? - need ideas
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mik" data-source="post: 375362" data-attributes="member: 6552"><p>Ah, I see more clearly some of what you are looking for, Emricol - the motivation for a hobgoblin to become a courtly knight.</p><p></p><p>I'm no medieval scholar, so some of this is probably 'made up history', but I'd say the warrior needs something else - outside pressure - to become more of a knight.</p><p></p><p>For the Franks, one of the initial pressures was heredity. Not the passing on of bloodlines, but the passing on of property. Third and Fourth sons of families with lands had little chance of getting the family manor when the patrician passed, and some of them took to what could be construed as brigandage to fund themselves.</p><p></p><p>Now, rulers are a canny lot, and they saw that these mounted thugs were very effective warriors. Also, the cost of maintaining a single unit of heavy cavalry was prohibitively expensive. In the brigands, they had ready-made cavalry units that could maintain themselves, a nice savings on the usual cost of outfitting troops.</p><p></p><p>The rulers wanted to be able to call on these younger sons in wartime, but dreaded their disobedient streak. The introduction of the Church is claimed to be the essential difference between the 'thugs on horseback' and the 'chivalrous noble' phases of the knights' development.</p><p></p><p>By attaching religious sanction to the knights' existence, the Church managed to have influence over their actions. The church espoused a code of conduct that left the riding, fighting, and feasting in place, but put a lid on the protection racket, cursing, and whoring. </p><p></p><p>Nobles and rulers played along, providing hospitality for the knights, activities (tournaments), lands for those who acheived great things, honors and praise, and relatively puffed-up positions in their armies. Closer relations with the church and improved public reaction (due to cutting down on the brutality) cemented the image of the knight as a courtly warrior.</p><p></p><p>A lot of the specifics of the knightly codes and so forth are Christianity-specific, but if you wanted to keep specific aspects, I think a way can be found to influence hobgoblin behavior or fabricate an impetus.</p><p></p><p>So, to sum up:</p><p></p><p>(Mounted warrior + great skill + no inheritance) + (savvy leadership + need of heavy cavalry + expense of standing force of cavalry) * (influence of powerful church) = knight.</p><p></p><p>There's my take on it.</p><p>=Mik</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mik, post: 375362, member: 6552"] Ah, I see more clearly some of what you are looking for, Emricol - the motivation for a hobgoblin to become a courtly knight. I'm no medieval scholar, so some of this is probably 'made up history', but I'd say the warrior needs something else - outside pressure - to become more of a knight. For the Franks, one of the initial pressures was heredity. Not the passing on of bloodlines, but the passing on of property. Third and Fourth sons of families with lands had little chance of getting the family manor when the patrician passed, and some of them took to what could be construed as brigandage to fund themselves. Now, rulers are a canny lot, and they saw that these mounted thugs were very effective warriors. Also, the cost of maintaining a single unit of heavy cavalry was prohibitively expensive. In the brigands, they had ready-made cavalry units that could maintain themselves, a nice savings on the usual cost of outfitting troops. The rulers wanted to be able to call on these younger sons in wartime, but dreaded their disobedient streak. The introduction of the Church is claimed to be the essential difference between the 'thugs on horseback' and the 'chivalrous noble' phases of the knights' development. By attaching religious sanction to the knights' existence, the Church managed to have influence over their actions. The church espoused a code of conduct that left the riding, fighting, and feasting in place, but put a lid on the protection racket, cursing, and whoring. Nobles and rulers played along, providing hospitality for the knights, activities (tournaments), lands for those who acheived great things, honors and praise, and relatively puffed-up positions in their armies. Closer relations with the church and improved public reaction (due to cutting down on the brutality) cemented the image of the knight as a courtly warrior. A lot of the specifics of the knightly codes and so forth are Christianity-specific, but if you wanted to keep specific aspects, I think a way can be found to influence hobgoblin behavior or fabricate an impetus. So, to sum up: (Mounted warrior + great skill + no inheritance) + (savvy leadership + need of heavy cavalry + expense of standing force of cavalry) * (influence of powerful church) = knight. There's my take on it. =Mik [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Roman "knights" ?? - need ideas
Top