Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Roshambo-Style Theatre of the Mind Combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="volanin" data-source="post: 7315689" data-attributes="member: 69817"><p>I'm back!</p><p>Sorry for the long delay!</p><p>Year's end and everything! Hope you all had awesome holidays!</p><p><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I actually think it's excellent! But Flanking was deliberately left out of the PDF because the intention was to focus on how to make TotM more interesting, while trying to stick as close as possible to the core rules, by adding the minimum necessary in order to address TotM tactical deficiences when compared to Grid play.</p><p></p><p>Flanking is something people have been asking for since 5e was out, and your implementation would be a great way to make Flanking work while using the Roshambo rules! Be sure I'll steal it someday if I ever expand this document!</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry, that was bad wording. You don't choose to be "ready to Intercept" in the rules sense. Or you're able to Intercept, or you aren't... and you choose to set up this situation for your character beforehand.</p><p></p><p>But allow be to expand. Here what's "you're missing"...</p><p>Or as I prefer to put it, here is what "isn't very obvious and you're right in questioning it":</p><p></p><p>As I said to [MENTION=6794298]pehaimi[/MENTION] above, the focus of this document is how to make TotM more interesting, while adding the minimum necessary to address its deficiences. And basically, TotM has two colossal deficiences: distance and position adjudication, which these rules want to deal with.</p><p></p><p>When Intercept was created, it was not meant to be a new attacking option for your character. Just like Flanking, this is not the focus of the document. Intercept was created to address the tactical <strong>positioning</strong> that exists in Grid play. There are some "hot squares" in the Grid that have tactical advantages: The square in front of a door, that you want to hold. The square in the middle of a narrow corridor that you want to block. The square in front of the enemy alarm, that you want to prevent them from reaching.</p><p></p><p>Since Roshambo TotM makes movement freeform, there is nothing preventing the enemy from getting through you, and these "hot squares" or "advantageous positions" lose their meaning. And Intercept was conceived in order to allow these positions to be relevant. You can actually do something when an enemy tries to become engaged to the door, to become engaged to your allies behind you in the hallway or to become engaged to the alarm switch.</p><p></p><p>In Grid play, you'd have to hold your position at these spots (and as such, deliberately choose not to engage an enemy a few squares away). And that's why you have to be unengaged in order to Intercept, it simulates this "cost" of holding your tactical position.</p><p></p><p>Or, in another point of view: if a Goblin is charging the Wizard, the official rules never allowed you to use your Reaction to break your current engagement with the Orc, run a few squares and block the Goblin... you'd have to already be in a "hot square" in front of the Wizard in order to be able to do something (even if this something is just an Opportunity Attack). That's the Intercept intention.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="volanin, post: 7315689, member: 69817"] I'm back! Sorry for the long delay! Year's end and everything! Hope you all had awesome holidays! ;) I actually think it's excellent! But Flanking was deliberately left out of the PDF because the intention was to focus on how to make TotM more interesting, while trying to stick as close as possible to the core rules, by adding the minimum necessary in order to address TotM tactical deficiences when compared to Grid play. Flanking is something people have been asking for since 5e was out, and your implementation would be a great way to make Flanking work while using the Roshambo rules! Be sure I'll steal it someday if I ever expand this document! Sorry, that was bad wording. You don't choose to be "ready to Intercept" in the rules sense. Or you're able to Intercept, or you aren't... and you choose to set up this situation for your character beforehand. But allow be to expand. Here what's "you're missing"... Or as I prefer to put it, here is what "isn't very obvious and you're right in questioning it": As I said to [MENTION=6794298]pehaimi[/MENTION] above, the focus of this document is how to make TotM more interesting, while adding the minimum necessary to address its deficiences. And basically, TotM has two colossal deficiences: distance and position adjudication, which these rules want to deal with. When Intercept was created, it was not meant to be a new attacking option for your character. Just like Flanking, this is not the focus of the document. Intercept was created to address the tactical [B]positioning[/B] that exists in Grid play. There are some "hot squares" in the Grid that have tactical advantages: The square in front of a door, that you want to hold. The square in the middle of a narrow corridor that you want to block. The square in front of the enemy alarm, that you want to prevent them from reaching. Since Roshambo TotM makes movement freeform, there is nothing preventing the enemy from getting through you, and these "hot squares" or "advantageous positions" lose their meaning. And Intercept was conceived in order to allow these positions to be relevant. You can actually do something when an enemy tries to become engaged to the door, to become engaged to your allies behind you in the hallway or to become engaged to the alarm switch. In Grid play, you'd have to hold your position at these spots (and as such, deliberately choose not to engage an enemy a few squares away). And that's why you have to be unengaged in order to Intercept, it simulates this "cost" of holding your tactical position. Or, in another point of view: if a Goblin is charging the Wizard, the official rules never allowed you to use your Reaction to break your current engagement with the Orc, run a few squares and block the Goblin... you'd have to already be in a "hot square" in front of the Wizard in order to be able to do something (even if this something is just an Opportunity Attack). That's the Intercept intention. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Roshambo-Style Theatre of the Mind Combat
Top