Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 5976311" data-attributes="member: 54877">I didn't see anything objectionable in that article.&nbsp; If any of the usual suspects want to continue making stupid &quot;4E is a MMORPG&quot; statements, they've demonstrated over the last several years that they don't need a statement from Mearls that they can twist out of context, if you don't look at it too closely.&nbsp; So nothing has changed on that front.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp;I find it much more interesting that WotC, finally, seems to be really coming to terms with the differences between options, frameworks, and so forth in a game model.&nbsp; Even better, they seem to be reaching that through practical experimentation and analysis.&nbsp; This means that 5E will probably have some holes in it, as the first cut once that understanding is reached, but that it might be a more stable platform upon which to build going forward.&nbsp; That is, they'll mess some things up and get some things right, but the things they get right will be solid enough to build on.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Crazy Jerome, post: 5976311, member: 54877"] I didn't see anything objectionable in that article. If any of the usual suspects want to continue making stupid "4E is a MMORPG" statements, they've demonstrated over the last several years that they don't need a statement from Mearls that they can twist out of context, if you don't look at it too closely. So nothing has changed on that front. ;) I find it much more interesting that WotC, finally, seems to be really coming to terms with the differences between options, frameworks, and so forth in a game model. Even better, they seem to be reaching that through practical experimentation and analysis. This means that 5E will probably have some holes in it, as the first cut once that understanding is reached, but that it might be a more stable platform upon which to build going forward. That is, they'll mess some things up and get some things right, but the things they get right will be solid enough to build on. [/QUOTE]

Verification